The Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR is physically just like the Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR, earning it “world’s lightest 300mm full-frame lens” title. Nikon was able to achieve this by using a Phase Fresnel (PF) lens element, which can effectively reduce the need to use complex...
As all of Nikon's 300mm f/2.8 EDs have been, performance is exceptional, even shot wide-open. Anything that's not sharp isyour fault, not the lens.' Nikon's MTF curves confirm this; its essentially optically perfect: Nikon's MTF chart.explanation. Spherochromatism The 300/2.8 has no ...
Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/4E FL ED VR Lens 24 $7,296.95 $10,296.95 Canon TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro Tilt-Shift Lens 15 $2,199.00 Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 for Nikon F 382 $1,399.00 Nikon AF-P NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR Lens 137...
1964-1969: 300mm f/4.5 NIKKOR-PNikon's first 300mm SLR lens was the f/4 NIKKOR-P.It had 5 elements (P = Penta = 5) and had very strong lateral color fringing.1969-1998: 300mm f/4.5 NIKKOR-H to AI-sNikon updated the design to six elements in the 300mm f/4.5 NIKKOR-H (H...
Nikon D800 75-300mm Lens Artifactmmalik
Nikon 300mm f/4 Lenses Compared Why Fixed Lenses Take Better Pictures Introductiontop IntroSpecsPerformanceComparedUsageRecommendationsMore Adorama pays top dollar for your used gear. I usethese stores. I can't vouch foradsbelow. This was the smallest fixed-focal length 300mm lens ever made by ...
Nikon 300mm f/2.8 AF-S II at f/5.6. 9 rounded blades. Stops down to f/22. Round to f/5.6. Straight-sided at f/16 and f/22. Coveragetop 35mm film,FXandDX. Focal Lengthtop 300mm. When used on aDX camera, it seesangles of viewsimilar to what a 450mm lens sees when used on...
Nikon's first primitive 300mm f/2.8 ED super tele was impractical because it had klunky, slow traditional unit focusing and a manual diaphragm. As you focused, the entire lens had to rack in and out, not exactly the thing for sports, which is the whole point of this lens. ...
If you need tougher, spend twice as much on the fully professional 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-D for $1,100. If you can do without VR (I can't), get the non-VR 70-300mm G for $150. For DX, if you already have the Nikon 18-200mm VR, I won't bother getting this lens, too, ...
There is the possibility that it just may be (or may not be) sharper than the other 300mm lenses, in which case for still subjects it could be a good lens. On the other hand, there are plenty of 300mm f/4 AF ED-IF lenses out there used at about $650 US, and those are great...