You may apply these rules when naming anything inside the database, including tables, columns, primary and foreign keys, stored procedures, functions, views, etc. You need not apply rules to all database objects. For instance, it would be perfectly fine to limit naming convention rules to ...
I have come to the conclusion that no convention is necessarily right or wrong. I have also come to the conclusion that a given standard might be "good" and still not necessarily fit every solution. Ultimately, you need to do what works best for your project, and the conventions I am ab...
I’ve already stated it in the intro, but more generally, a naming convention is a set of rules you decide to go with before you start modeling your database. You’ll apply these rules while naming anything inside the database – tables, columns,primaryandforeign keys,stored procedures,func...
so it's easy to see what I can do to any given table. Using the prefix "usp" lets me know what I'm calling if I'm (for example) writing a 1000-line procedure that interacts with other procedures, multiple tables, functions, views and servers. ...
Naming Conventions for Entity Framework Core Tables and Columns By default, EF Core will map to tables and columns named exactly after your .NET classes and properties. For example, mapping a typical Customer class to PostgreSQL will result in SQL such as the following: ...
of naming convention for views, as it's not visible at a glance that you're referencing a view rather than a table and I find there are less developer mistakes when they're obviously marked in the name (e.g. re-utilising views inappropriately rather than going back to the base tables)...
SQL Server Stored Procedure Naming Styles As with tables and columns, I've seen many variations onprocedure naming syntax. Consider astored procedureto get the list of customers. You could have, among other things, these choices: Customer_GetList CustomerList GetCustomerList GetCustomers ListCustomer...
ON PRS.TTL_ID = TTL.TTL_ID ... PLEASE, do not forget that SQL Server is CASE SENSITIVE with SQL names ! PS : I have right a complete paper on the topic, but this paper is in french. http://sqlpro.developpez.com/Methode/SGBDR_nom.html ...
SQL Server StandardsVersion 1.5Shane Lively & Michael Sarsany Page 1 of 24The main goal of adopting a naming convention for database objects is so that you and others can easily identify the type and purpose of all objects contained in the database. The information presented here serves as ...
Pros: If most access will be made via VIEWS then prefixing all the tables with T_ and all the views with V_ keeps things organised neatly, you will never accidentally query the wrong one. Cons: Suppose, your naming convention is to have the '_TAB' suffix for all tables. According to...