Naming and Necessity 作者:Saul A·Kripke 出版社:Harvard University Press 出版年:1980-7-26 页数:192 定价:USD 25.00 装帧:Paperback ISBN:9780674598461 豆瓣评分 9.0 126人评价 5星 71.4% 4星 19.0% 3星 7.9% 2星 0.0% 1星 1.6% 评价: 写笔记 写书评
The general unifying theme is that Naming and Necessity is helping philosophy to recover a Golden Age, by freeing it from the strictures coming from the empiricist and Kantian traditions and reconnecting it to the world and the objects that populate it. Because of this, in the concluding ...
(Kripke, 1980) ⇒ Saul Kripke. (1980). “Naming and Necessity.” Harvard University Press. ISBN:0674598466 Subject Headings: Named Entity Mention, Reference, Rigid Designator, Lexical Semantics. Notes It is based on Lectures delivered in 1970. It introduces the concept of a Rigid Designator ...
Naming and Necessity 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书 著者简介 索尔·克里普克(Saul Kripke 1941—),美国著名的逻辑学家和哲学家,模态逻辑语义学创始人之一。他少年时期已显得颇有才华,16岁念中学时写的一篇关于模态逻辑和直觉主义逻辑语义学的论文,曾引起美国逻辑学界的注意。后就读于哈佛大学,从师于蒯因等人。毕业...
SaulKripke NamingandNecessity(1972) LectureI §TheCaseofMoses[Wittgenstein] “Considerthisexample.Ifonesays“Mosesdid notexist,”thismaymeanvariousthings...HaveI decidedhowmuchmustbeprovedfalseformeto giveupmypropositionasfalse?Hasthename “Moses”gotafixedandunequivocaluseformein all...
I hope that some people see some connection between the two topics in the title. If not, anyway, such connections will be developed in the course of these talks. Furthermore, because of the use of tools involving reference and necessity in analytic philo
长期以来,关于克里普克(Saul Kripke)指称理论的论证,多数人都接受萨蒙(Nathan Salmon)那个很有影响的总结,即模态论证、认识论论证和语义学论证是克里普克整个论证的主体[1]23-31。然而,克里普克还有一个也很重要,但却很少被明确提到,或虽提到,但在概念上缺乏定位的论证,即本文所欲考察的语用学论证(“语用学论证...
作者: 索尔·A·克里普克 Saul A. Kripke 收藏和分享命名与必然性: 去卓越亚马逊购买命名与必然性中文版英文版 命名与必然性(Naming and Necessity)简介: If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it. Ever since the publication of its origi...
These addenda represent certain amplifications of the original text which I have added either in response to questions or for the sake of clarification or sketchy amplification.doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_26Donald DavidsonGilbert HarmanSpringer Netherlands...
If there is thus "unwanted necessity" in predications about names, this can be defused with a consideration of analyticity itself. Indeed, for all that Kripke is quoted by Devitt and Sterelny, his suggestion that there can be "analytica posteriori" propositions is not mentioned in this context...