“What Taylor Swift wanted was, you know, vindication of the moral right, the legal right, that sexual assault is reprehensible and wrong,” JusticeAmy Coney Barrettadded later during the same arguments. Maybe Swift’s case had an impact: Two months later, the Supreme Court ruled that litigan...
07 (ANI): The Supreme Court of India on Saturday cleared the names of five people -- four Advocates and one Judicial Officer -- for their appointment as Jammu and Kashmir High Court judges. 07 ( ANI ): The Supreme Court of India on Saturday cleared the names of five people -- four ...
Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the Chisom v. Roemer case that the race-bias laws could legitimately be extended to cover not only election of legislators and government officials but also of judges. Background of the case; Bases of the court's ruling.EBSCO_AspEconomist...
Almost all legal name change cases, in California, have a required hearing. However, some courts, and some judges Grant petitions without an actual hearing, based on the filed and acquired documents. Some types of name changes (very few) don’t require a hearing, under law (see CCP 1276(...
Judges were given great latitude as well, and this translated to large variations in sentencing; depending on the city, state, and court/judge, sentencing would vary from probation to 25+ years for the same crime! This must stop. Irrespective of where criminals decide to break laws, all crim...
There was only one candidate that carried the hope of the restoration of righteous judges in the land, only one candidate that stood for life. Ohio was highly significant to me for a couple of reasons. I was in Middletown, Ohio exactly 1 year ago at the Appeal to Heaven Conference, on ...
In 1986, three justices of the Supreme Court were voted out (arguably) because of their principled opposition to the death penalty. No Justice has failed a retention vote since then. So, vote yes on retaining appellate judges! The fact that there’s a vote at all is bad, but the least...
High Court granted injunctions against the One in a Million for the threat of "passing off" and trademark infringement and ordered the two Brits to surrender the domain names and pay 65,000 pounds to the trademark owners. While the pair denied any intent to deceive, the appellate judges ...
. O’Bryan J was sceptical that this was just Aristocrat trying to have a “second go”. Rather, the additional factor is hows 23of the Judiciary Act should apply in circumstances where all six judges of the High Court appear to have rejected the majority view in the Full Federal Court....
In the Texas case, the court overturned the federal approval because a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement examining environmental justice issues wasn’t issued for public comment.” THE RULE OF FLAW —“Judges toss false-arrest claims against federal marshals in mistaken-identity case,” by ...