1. 手动调整log sequence number 用gdb启动进程, 设置断点, 跟踪 log_sys数据结构, 把这个值改成报错信息对应的数字即可 代码语言:txt AI代码解释 gdb -p pgrep -x mysqld gdb) p log_sys->lsn $1 = 4419634190 (gdb) set log_sys->lsn = 4414499637 (gdb)
Current system log sequence number2243439748.2023-04-26T02:58:53.108202Z0[ERROR] [MY-011972] [InnoDB] Your database may be corrupt or you may have copied the InnoDB tablespace but not the InnoDB log files. Please refer to http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/forcing-innodb-recovery.html ...
And you need to kill whatever process is doing those backdoor writes.Navigate: Previous Message• Next Message Options: Reply• Quote Subject Views Written By Posted "log sequence number is in the future!" on the slave? 1054 Jan Andersen July 02, 2021 03:53AM Re: "log sequence ...
Tablespace 'innodb_system' Page [page id: space=0, page number=3] log sequence number xxx is in the future! Current system log sequence number yyy. 1. 这个错误通常是由于MySQL版本升级后,旧的系统表空间(innodb_system)和新版本不兼容导致的。为了解决这个问题,我们需要执行一系列的步骤。 解决方案步...
mysql oom之后的page 447 log sequence number 292344272 is in the future,mysqloom之后,重启时发生13051716:00:10InnoDB:Error:page447logsequencenumber292344272InnoDB:isinthefuture!Currentsystemlogsequencenumber159
InnoDB:Error:page14518log sequence number5698741252InnoDB:isinthe future!Current system log sequence number5698741252 问题分析: innodb 数据文件损坏。 解决方法: 修改 my.cnf 配置文件,在 [mysqld] 下添加innodb_force_recovery=4, 启动数据库后备份数据文件,然后再去掉该参数,利用备份文件恢复数据。
命令行中的Log sequence number是指什么？Log sequence number: 表示当前内存缓冲区中的 Redo Log 的 ...
log sequence number 就是当前的 redo log (in buffer) 中的 LSN; log flushed up to 是刷到 redo log file 磁盘数据中的 LSN; pages flushed up to 是已经刷到磁盘数据页上的 LSN; last checkpoint at 是上一次检查点所在位置的 LSN。 从执行修改语句开始看InnoDB引擎的执行过程 ...
check point指向下一个要提交的LSN(log sequence number),之前的都是提交过的。 write pos指向写入内存的LSN。顺时针check point和writie point之间就是刷盘的内容。 LSN应该是异页为单位,因为redolog记录的是物理页对应的值。 当write pos超过check point时,会触发刷盘,否则新数据会覆盖未刷盘的数据。
The link in the log file does not provide much more info that what I have already done. So now the the server complains about "log sequence number is in the future!" Which I might be able to fix but my worry is still the corrupt table. ...