1. 手动调整log sequence number 用gdb启动进程, 设置断点, 跟踪 log_sys数据结构, 把这个值改成报错信息对应的数字即可 代码语言:txt AI代码解释 gdb -p pgrep -x mysqld gdb) p log_sys->lsn $1 = 4419634190 (gdb) set log_sys->lsn = 4414499637 (gdb)
Current system log sequence number2243439748.2023-04-26T02:58:53.108202Z0[ERROR] [MY-011972] [InnoDB] Your database may be corrupt or you may have copied the InnoDB tablespace but not the InnoDB log files. Please refer to http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/forcing-innodb-recovery.html ...
And you need to kill whatever process is doing those backdoor writes.Navigate: Previous Message• Next Message Options: Reply• Quote Subject Views Written By Posted "log sequence number is in the future!" on the slave? 1054 Jan Andersen July 02, 2021 03:53AM Re: "log sequence ...
Tablespace 'innodb_system' Page [page id: space=0, page number=3] log sequence number xxx is in the future! Current system log sequence number yyy. 1. 这个错误通常是由于MySQL版本升级后,旧的系统表空间(innodb_system)和新版本不兼容导致的。为了解决这个问题,我们需要执行一系列的步骤。 解决方案步...
mysql oom之后的page 447 log sequence number 292344272 is in the future,mysqloom之后,重启时发生13051716:00:10InnoDB:Error:page447logsequencenumber292344272InnoDB:isinthefuture!Currentsystemlogsequencenumber159
E.Sequence in the Pocket #include #define ll long long using namespace std; #define 64520 Mysql启动失败 InnoDB Error: log sequence number is in the future 如何修复 Mysql启动失败 InnoDB Error: "log sequence number is in the future" 问题背景 自动昨天暴力重启了macbook, 继上个问题 之后...有...
log sequence number 就是当前的 redo log (in buffer) 中的 LSN; log flushed up to 是刷到 redo log file 磁盘数据中的 LSN; pages flushed up to 是已经刷到磁盘数据页上的 LSN; last checkpoint at 是上一次检查点所在位置的 LSN。 从执行修改语句开始看InnoDB引擎的执行过程 ...
check point指向下一个要提交的LSN(log sequence number),之前的都是提交过的。 write pos指向写入内存的LSN。顺时针check point和writie point之间就是刷盘的内容。 LSN应该是异页为单位,因为redolog记录的是物理页对应的值。 当write pos超过check point时,会触发刷盘,否则新数据会覆盖未刷盘的数据。
命令行中的Log sequence number是指什么？Log sequence number: 表示当前内存缓冲区中的 Redo Log 的 ...
The link in the log file does not provide much more info that what I have already done. So now the the server complains about "log sequence number is in the future!" Which I might be able to fix but my worry is still the corrupt table. ...