we are configuring an MSA 2050 we want setup both controller array in this way: 1 DG with 7 disks of 600 GB 10k each 1 DG with 3 disks of 1.8 TB 10k each the enclusure: 1 DG with 11 disks of 1.8 TB 10k each Is it possible to configure the MSA as reported above ? Are there...
Re: MSA2050 Replacing failed disk Can you please provide below outputs (please mask the serial numbers), show disk-groups show disks If the replaced drive shows as "Available" which means still its not configured as Spare drive. So suggest you to follow the below steps and configure Global...
The replication set status appears differently in MSA 2040/1040 and MSA 2050/1050 systems when a replication is aborted. MSA 2050/1050 shows the status as Suspended, MSA 2040/1040 shows the status as Unsynchronized. Attempting to delete a peer connection when a controller...
Issue:Attempting to display historical performance data with 33 or more disks selected in the SMU will result in an error of "Failed to collect historical performance data. The value of the time-range parameter is invalid. Retry the request with a valid value". Workaro...
• If the indicated disk group is RAID 6, it is operating with degraded health due to the failure of two disks. • If the indicated disk group is not RAID 6, it is operating with degraded health due to the failure of one disk. If a dedicated spare (linear only) or global spare...
Provide feedback We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously. Include my email address so I can be contacted Cancel Submit feedback Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly Cancel Create saved search Sign in Sign up {...
HP存储也是在企业中常用的存储设备了，本次分享的故障设备为：HP FC MSA2000存储，由于RAID5阵列中出现...
Re: MSA 2050 disk group configuration Hi ! thanks for your reply! it is my bad I forgot to explain that the configuration we want to do is the same on both controller , so the number of disk and disk group is multiplied by 2,consider also we will add spare disks and ssd for fast...
Thank you very much for the detailed reply - I think we have directly found my problem... Disks 2.1 to 2.12 are Midline SAS, so the IOPS are to high. think mymajor mistakeisnot using"the power of two"... i got: 5 SAS in Raid 5 / 1.3 1.7 --> ok6 SAS inRaid...
Solved: Hello we are configuring an MSA 2050 we want setup both controller array in this way: 1 DG with 7 disks of 600 GB 10k each 1 DG with 3 disks of 1.8 TB 10k