The UK General Medical Council has emphasized the lack of evidence on whether graduates from different UK medical schools perform differently in their clinical careers. Here we assess the performance of UK graduates who have taken MRCP(UK) Part 1 and Par
In the second call, the calling number is 33333 and it calls number 44444. The example shows how to filter the API event traces where the calling number is 11111: Device# show monitor event-trace voip ccsip api filter calling-num 11111 all ---Cover buff--- buffer-id = 1 ccCallId =...
MRCP(UK) performance and being on the Specialist Register also show consistent correlations with undergraduate performance, most obviously in the UCLMS cohorts. In all the cohorts, it is clear that at almost every stage of attainment, there are causal links back to attainment at earlier stages....
Firstly, it does assume that examiner behaviour remains unchanged when only one examiner is present rather than two. However the presence of another examiner, and the potential for cross-checking between independently given marks, may well encourage each of the examiners to be more careful in ...
Figure 8 shows the fitted curves for the Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations and it can be seen how the curves approximate to but do not reach the maximum levels. The dashed lines in Figure 7 also show the expected change at each attempt (in effect the first differential) and these ...
but it did show correlations with MRCP(UK) (0.13, 0.27 and 0.19). By contrast, in the Westminster Cohort Study, the AH5 seemed to predict undergraduate clinical performance (r = 0.21), but had a negative correlation with MRCP(UK) Part 1 (r = -0.15). Taken overall, it seems doubtful...