Welcome to the public wiki 'Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool' Aim of this WIKI: To enable collaborative work for developing a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The MMAT is intended to be used as a checklist for concomitantly appraising and/ordescribingstudies included in systematic mixed studies ...
Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature were conducted across CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, Cochrane, Scopus, and PubMed databases following the PRISMA guideline. All included studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Checklist by independe...
Assessment of risk of bias used adapted BMJ survey appraisal tools, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for quality assessment. Methods of data synthesis employed the Social Ecological Framework and Health Belief Model for data synthesis. We did ...
A quality assessment of the included studies was conducted in duplicate by two independent reviewers (EB, MZ), using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 (Hong et al., 2018). The MMAT is a quality appraisal instrument for mixed-method reviews, content validated and piloted ...
Methodological quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Discussion Understanding individual, clinical and wider contextual factors associated with access and receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapies for secondary breast cancer is a complex phenomenon. These will ...
[25]. Study quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the JBI Checklist for RCTs as appropriate [26]. An assessment of the overall certainty of evidence using the GRADE or ConQual approach is not recommended [17,27] for JBI MMSRs because ...
The predominance of some intrapartum recommendations, such as not using the Kristeller maneuver and amniotomy, the use of pain relief methods during labor and being allowed to eat and drink during labor and delivery, contributed good experiences in the current research, which was also observed in ...
In: Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. London: Sage Publications; 2005. p. 42–63. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):229–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023254226592. Article PubMed Google ...
Two independent reviewers subsequently used the mixed-methods appraisal tool to assess the methodological quality of 57 full-text studies that met the inclusion criteria after full-text screening. The interventions were summarised using the TIDierR checklist and TEO. The strength of evidence was ...
Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data was analysed and synthesized using the Supporting the Use of Research Evidence (SURE) framework to identify barriers and enabling factors to implementing midwife-led care. Findings A total of 31 studies from 21...