McPherson, SaraReese, CynthiaWendler, M. CeciliaUniv Illinois Coll Nursing Springfield Campus Springfield IL USAFortschritte der PhysikMcPherson, S., Reese, C. & Wendler, M.C. (2018). Methodology Update: Delphi Studies. Nursing research, 67(5):404-410....
Consensus-orientated Delphi studies are increasingly used in various areas of medical research using a variety of different rating scales and criteria for reaching consensus. We explored the influence of using three different rating scales and different consensus criteria on the results for reaching conse...
The proportion of discordant recommendations identified in this analysis was higher than some previous international studies (range of all strong recommendations being discordant 30–50%), but similar to other guidelines focused on emergency situations. The majority of discordant recommendations could be ma...
Therefore, this update includes 26 quality tools. Details on the characteristics and psychometric properties of the new quality tools are presented in Tables 1 and 2.\ Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram for identification of studies. Full size image Table 1 Characteristics of tools identified in the ...
McPherson, SaraReese, CynthiaWendler, M. CeciliaUniv Illinois Coll Nursing Springfield Campus Springfield IL USANursing researchMcPherson, S., Reese, C. & Wendler, M.C. (2018). Methodology Update: Delphi Studies. Nursing research, 67(5):404-410....
The aim of this study was to update the checklist to address these concerns. METHODS. A fourth round of the Delphi consensus study, used in the original checklist development work, was conducted. Previous participants, who had expertise in SP methodology, were invited to comp...
studies which reported developing critical appraisal tools using a consensus approach, a range of stakeholder input was sought, reflecting researchers and clinicians in a range of health disciplines, students, educators and consumers. There were a further 31 papers which cited other studies as the ...
Explanatory studies, although highly internally valid, are often less generalizable to outpatient community settings. There has been a call for more real-world ‘practical’ or ‘pragmatic’ studies to enhance generalizability, but only rudimentary methods for distinguishing between efficacy (explanatory) ...
studies which reported developing critical appraisal tools using a consensus approach, a range of stakeholder input was sought, reflecting researchers and clinicians in a range of health disciplines, students, educators and consumers. There were a further 31 papers which cited other studies as the ...
Our objective was to complete a scoping review within the healthcare context to synthesize: 1) articles that utilized and/or described scoping review methods; 2) guidelines for reporting scoping reviews; and 3) studies that assessed the quality of reporting of scoping reviews....