Matthew 17 . 24-27 and its Value for HistoricalHarb, Gertraud
(1:1-17); his lack of explanation of Jewish customs (especially in contrast to Mark); his use of Jewish terminology (e.g., "kingdom of heaven," where "heaven" reveals the Jewish reverential reluctance to use the name of God; see note on3:2); his emphasis on Jesus' role as "Son...
gender) of Matthew to my knowledge dates to 1983 by Janice Capel Anderson, “Matthew: Gender and Reading”Semeia28 (1983): 3–27. There have been a number of ideological readings of Matthew since then: feminist (Elaine Wainwright, Amy-Jill Levine, Marianne...
“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will
An Explanation 10 Then the disciples came to Him and asked, “Why do You speak to the crowds in parables?” 11 Jesus replied to them, “To you it has been granted to know the [cz]mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been granted. 12 For whoever has [spir...
"Matthew, having spent alot of time in the Arab world as well, I must say I can not deny your logical explanation, Alot of Islamist have realized that the political route is very effective and can be very beneiftial to their cause, and can gain a substantial backing if done correctly....
Without considering the explanation above, this is a logical argument. Christ was with the Father from the beginning (John 1:1). He is the Creator, with the Father, not the created. Beyond these concepts, which God has revealed, we have not been told and could not understand correctly. ...
Scripture:Proverbs 3:9-10,Joshua 24:15-17,Genesis 18:21,Matthew 16:19,Matthew 7:24-27,Matthew 12:45-49 Denomination:Baptist Summary:Today, we make our one singular choice to Follow God’s Way, with the resources that God has placed in our c...
And sometimes it's like, "Oh, I wish I could explain it." No, no, not, not yet, that ship already sailed. I can't really explain it to them if it didn't need — if something is put up in a true way, it doesn't need explanation. But then I think just decide for who's ...
(internal citation omitted). Where "Plaintiff's allegations 20 do not establish that Defendants' conduct was the 'moving cause' " of any harm," or where "there 21 exists… an 'obvious alternative explanation' for any alleged harm," the "resulting damages" 22 element of an intentional ...