LUMBAR LAMINECTOMY / DISKECTOMY / FUSION POST-SURGICAL REHABILITATION PROTOCOLPOST-OP DAYS
POSTDOC POSTECH POSTECS Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion POSTFAT PostG POSTI POSTNET POSTOP POSTREQ POSTS POSTW POSU POSUM POSV POSW POSWE POSYBL POT POT&I POT1 Pot9 POTA POTAD POTAG POTAM PotAnn POTAS POTATO ▼ Full browser ? ▲ posterior liver Posterior lobe Posterior lobe Posterior...
Anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical option for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Prior studies demonstrated compensatory correction of the thoracic curve after lumbar posterior spinal fusion (PSF); however, no studies have examined thoracic curve correctio...
Results: On statistical analysis of comparative data of our study and other studies in literature, we found that the simple discectomy group had statistically better outcome with respect to the instrumented group in back ache VAS scores and ODI in both post op 1 month and 1 year interval. ...
Titanium cages (BAK Interbody Fusion System) implanted in the IVDs during interbody fusion spine surgery also have been shown to increase IVF volume at L4-5 and L5-S1 (Chen et al., 1995). Many of the pathologic conditions described as affecting the NRC, such as anterior osteophytes on the...
Retrospective cohort study. To validate computed tomography (CT) radiodensity in Hounsfield units (HU) as a prognostic marker for pedicle screw loosening or cage subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). The retro
Bridwell’s fusion grading system was used to estimate lumbar fusion at 6 m postop, 1 y postop, and at the last follow-up. None of the patients underwent reoperation. The difference was statistically significant at 6 m postop; however, there was no significant difference between the two ...
One patient developed mechanical ileus for 48 hours postop, resolved with NG tube. Conclusion: Stand-alone Mini anterior inter-body fusion is a valid option when treating degenerative/discogenic back pain, the ROA-I implant is a safe and simple, with satisfactory results up to 12 month, ...
The comparison between both groups on 3-, 6- and 12-months post op showed no statistical difference (Table 3). The SF-36 result also showed a comparable outcome between both groups (Table 4). The fusion rate at the 12-month follow-up were 93.3% in the conventional MIS TLIF and 92.7%...
The comparison between both groups on 3-, 6- and 12-months post op showed no statistical difference (Table 3). The SF-36 result also showed a comparable outcome between both groups (Table 4). The fusion rate at the 12-month follow-up were 93.3% in the conventional MIS TLIF and 92.7%...