PANEL ONE: PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT: SECURITIES LITIGATION AND ITS LAWYERS: CHANGES DURING THE FIRST DECADE AFTER THE PSLRA Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers:Changes During the First Decade After the PSLRA[J].COL-UM L REV 2006,106.Choi, SJ & Thompson, RB 2006, 'Securities...
This study empirically evaluates the impact of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) and the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 upon the (equity) risk of the largest US firms, the backbone of the US economy. Drawing from the literature, hypotheses are developed and empirically ...
PANEL ONE: PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT: SECURITIES LITIGATION AND ITS LAWYERS: CHANGES DURING THE FIRST DECADE AFTER THE PSLRA. Choi, SJ & Thompson, RB 2006, 'Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers: Changes during the First Decade after the PSLRA', Columbia Law Review, vol. ......
Hovil, Lucy and Lomo, Zachary, “Whose Justice? Perceptions of Uganda’s Amnesty Act 2000,” Refugee Law Project Working paper no. 15. Hovil, Lucy and Lomo, Zachary,Working Paper 11: Behind the Violence: Causes, Consequences and the Search for Solutions to the War in Northern Uganda, (...
Labour Court 2005) 1 Introduction As a result of pressure from the trade union movement to reconsider the policy norms governing retrenchments, significant amendments, both procedural and substantive, were made to the retrenchment provisions in the Labour Relations Act, 1995 ("the LRA") in 2002....
Our examination takes place in the context of two distinct pieces of legislation intended to alter the legal environment faced by corporate managers: (1) the PSLRA (1995), and (2) Sarbanes锟絆xley Act of 2002. Our findings indicate that the passage of legislation that increases litigation ...
Richall Holdings v Fitzwilliam, holds that Malory v Cheshire Homes is binding in relation to the Land Registration Act 2002. Newey J saw himself as bound by that decision because he could find no relevant distinction between the provisions of the Land Registration Act 1925, and the Land ...
Richall Holdings v Fitzwilliam , holds that Malory v Cheshire Homes is binding in relation to the Land Registration Act 2002. Newey J saw himself as bound by that decision because he could find no relevant distinction between the provisions of the Land Registration Act 1925, and the Land ...