Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction. Hepatology. 2006;44(2):489–501.Banff Working Group, Demetris AJ, Adeyi O, et al. Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction. Hepatology . 2006;44:489–501....
ScienceDirect will be phasing out support for Internet Explorer 7. Click here to upgrade to a higher version. Close Journals Books Shopping cart Sign in HelpPurchase Other export options You have selected 1 citation for export. Direct export About Mendeley About RefWorks Export file ...
15. However, liver biopsy procedures can cause pain and discomfort and pose risks of complication to patients, thus, significantly limit their clinical utilization. A window of opportunity to study liver biopsies exists during the evaluation of donor livers prior to transplantation, where post-mortem ...
Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 20, 15–20 (1994). Article Google Scholar Van Loo, P. et al. Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16910–16915 (2010). ...
Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occu... AJ Demetris - 《Hepatology》 被引量: 779发表: 2006年 ...
Conclusions: Clinically significant differences in liver biopsy interpretation between local pathologists and sub-specialists are common. Diagnoses with frequent discrepancies, such as biliary disease, may benefit from a specialist review as standard when initially diagnosed; whilst cases requiring specialist ...
This space is not normally discernible in biopsy material, but in autopsied liver the hepatocytes shrink from the sinusoids, and the space of Disse is then characteristically evident. Nevertheless, this fluid space represents 2–4% of the volume of the hepatic parenchyma. Studies with TEM show ...
Discordant results of one stage or more between biopsy and FT were at high as 41%. Being a serum marker, FT has the advantage of representing a more global estimate of liver fibrosis throughout the whole liver. One case was emblematic of the weakness of even a 20 mm-long biopsy: a ...
In comparison with liver biopsy, background fibrosis of liver can be diagnosed more correctly using surgically resected specimens because a large amount of tissue makes sampling variation less likely14. Noninvasive liver reserve models have been introduced to assess the severity of liver fibrosis as ...
Studies have shown mixed results regarding the amount of hepatic fibrosis, with some reporting worsening of fibrosis after treatment (from stages 3 to 4)48, while others have shown regression (from stages 4 to 3)34,48. A longer duration prior to collection of the post-treatment biopsy may ...