and clearly establishing specific punishments. But neither lawmakers nor the courts were very impressed. Congress had always accepted the distinction between civilian and military justice, and in a number of decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court consistently upheld the constitutionality of the court-martial...
“Before the Supreme Court can weigh in, the issue has to get to them somehow,” says Aaron Dantowitz, a litigation partner at Stockwoods LLP in Toronto. He says that, apart from the matter of Bill 5’s constitutionality working its way through the appeal process, the only oth...
Leveraging the Latest Court Decisions to Challenge Class Membership and Def... May 18, 2023 • CLE • CLE On-Demand This CLE course will discuss various avenues for opposing class certification beyond Rule 23(b)(3)'s predominance requirement, including arguments related to ascertainability, ...
Insurance law expert and humorist in his own right, Randy Maniloff, did a nice interview with me in the latest issue of Coverage Opinions, his bi-weekly electronic newsletter reporting and commenting on new court decisions addressing insurance coverage disputes. He asked a lot of great questions...
There is a difference between bending and breaking the law. While bending the statutes comprise of innovative application of legal avenues to win or achieve a goal within the precincts of the law, law breakers get prison-tickets. Your traffic attorneys should subsequently know the extent to which...
Medicaid Reimbursements, Medical Necessity, Medicare, Medicare Administrative Contractor, Medicare and Medicaid Provider Audits, Medicare Attorney, Medicare Audits, Medicare RAC, Provider Appeals of Adverse Decisions for Medicare and Medicaid, RAC Audits, Regulatory Audits, Tentative Notices of Overpayment, UP...