Landmark Supreme Court decision has major implications for litigation costs cases.The article discusses the court case wherein Coventry and colleagues, the owners of a Suffolk house, filed an action for nuisance against Lawrence and a motor sports stadium operator. The defendants were ordered to ...
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: A Reference Guide : Donald E. Lively; Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1999, 384 pages, ISBN 0-313-30602-8 (US$59.95)doi:10.1016/S1352-0237(00)00211-2ChuckMaloneSDOSJournal of Government Information
Two veteran journalists profile landmark Supreme Court decisions on the death penalty, taking readers back to the crime scenes, presenting the very human stories of those victimized by brutal crime and those responsible for it, and tracing the cases to their final conclusion — either in the cour...
Supreme Court Makes Landmark Rulings on Attorney Fees in Patent CasesJeff C. Dodd
Indeed, from a criminal justice perspective, the “Dear Colleague ” rules are troubling. They specify no procedures for cross examination—a key constitutional right. And they insist colleges resolve sexual violence cases using the lowest standard of proof allowed in a court of law—what’s...
The Brown case addresses the focus of this study: That place, region, and political culture are important elements in cases heard by the Supreme Court. In this paper, we investigate these issues by examining the importance of place and region in the American legal system. What are the relatio...
In one of the few antitrust cases to appear before China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), a Compass Lexecon expert team provided testimony and analysis on…
The researchers' findings come at a time when not just Google but Meta, Amazon and Apple, the biggest tech companies in the world, are facing a series of landmark antitrust cases. The ruling against Google isn't necessarily an indication of the future—each case is different—but Wilson sa...
The EEOC argued status and conduct “routinely meld in Supreme Court and Title VII cases where a person’s sexual attraction or identification closely correlate to particular conduct.” The Court rejected that argument because in its view the majority inBostocknever held that “‘traits or actions...