习惯性搭配:in a landmark [decision, ruling] (from the courts) today, this is a landmark achievement for, is a landmark case [of, that],更多…… 标题中含有单词 'landmark' 的论坛讨论: 查看"landmark" 的谷歌机器翻译。 WordReference.com ...
In the 1980 case ofAgins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 100 S. Ct. 2138, 65 L. Ed. 2d 106, the Supreme Court ruled that "regulation is a taking if it doesn't substantially advance legitimate state interests or denies an owner economically viable use of his land."Aginsestablishe...
The article focuses on the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of Slater & Gordon and Woolworths wherein former employees of retail giant Woolworths will not receive redundancy payoff claiming that the workers were based in stores with fewer than 20 staff. Comments from...
the Miranda Dissents: Some Comments on the "New" Fifth Amendment and the Old "Voluntariness"Test Rag: The Dramatic Story of the Landmark Case That Gave New Meaning to 1; Benjamin R.Jacewicz, The Relationship of Judicial Politics and Cons... JA Thomson - 《Tulsa L J》 被引量: 0发表...
The U.S. Supreme Court has the chance to clarify — and possibly eliminate — software patents forever in its hearing of Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank. You may recall that the Federal Circuit had the chance to decide the case but failed to reach a conclusion. The case ...
Like in the case of the United States, there are currently no trade agreements between France and the UK directly. However, on Brexit, the UK has signed the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which offers a lot of benefits for British exporters, for instance: zero tariff and quotas on...
Like jazz improvisation, the meaning of Swift v. Tyson was elusive.1 Justice Joseph Story's 1842 opinion concerning an important commercial-law issue arose from a jury trial.2 When the creditor plaintiff appealed, counsel for the winning debtor raised as a defense Section 34 of the 1789 ...
if the answer to the first question is "EU law", should the concept of "undertaking" also apply in private damages proceedings? and if the answer is "national law", does the principle of effectiveness require that the parent companies in the case at hand are to be held liab...
[issue] in the whole law of copyright.’”[12]While this case demonstrates why American courts have grappled with the issue – both on the question of who makes the determination (judge or jury) and how to apply the non-exhaustive statutory factors, it might not beget any new guidance ...
The ruling now confirms that Whiskey & Wealth does not engage in securities investment or trading under US law, meaning that it is like buying collectibles such as art, a watch or a car. The final resolution rightfully abandons – in their entirety – all of the allegations that the Whiskey...