edrin k it a tan ytim eo fth eday a thom eo ri nteahouses .Th e ypref e rthei rt e awit hnothin gels ei nit.T e ai sver yimportan ti nJapan .Th eJapanes ehav e aspeci a lw a yo fservin gt e acall e dt e aceremony.I t isver yol dan dfu llo fmeaning s....
meaning they'll have FFFE in the middle? Also with the stateless DHCPv6, will slaac be used? Expand Post LikeLikedUnlikeReply Ing_Percy Edited by Admin February 16, 2020 at 4:22 AM Hi! In GNS3, you only can use DHCP stateless with SLAAC when you use VPCS multi-host I replaced ...
-It's an address translation, meaning that if you do NAT you also do NAT in both directions. -So if you Translate from 10.2.0.11 to 200.1.1.13 you also translate from 200.1.1.13 into 10.2.0.11. So with that said, from a topology perspective when looking at your above diagram it means...
Sometimes I cant remember 100% the full path or command, in real life I can do it no prob but in an exam situation if they dont allow the question mark and expect you to type th ecommand and subcommands on first try and fail you on the question if you need to back up or somethin...
Will advertise a route into the OSPF-domain IF and only IF there already exists a default-route in the routing-table. Meaning that you would need a "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x" already in the configuration or that command will do nothing. default-information originate always Will...
ARP is only done if we don't have the local neighbors mac address already in our arp cache. Expand Post LikeLikedUnlike compsolv Edited by Admin February 16, 2020 at 4:08 AM That's right! Pretty cool! How does you local machine know that it needs to arp for the local router instead...
offending meaning MAC addresses not configured. Edit: Just did a scan of the word "offending" and sure enough it is covered a few chapters later! Thanks all. Expand Post LikeLikedUnlikeReply cr.strum Edited by Admin February 16, 2020 at 4:25 AM Funny you bring this up, I just finished...
In the above scenario, these two routers will not have any problems exchanging routes and they are both running ver 1, but R2 is running an enhanced ver 1, meaning that the router can send ver 1 but has the capability to receive ver 1 and 2. Scenario #2: On R1: Router rip Ver ...
In the above scenario, these two routers will not have any problems exchanging routes and they are both running ver 1, but R2 is running an enhanced ver 1, meaning that the router can send ver 1 but has the capability to receive ver 1 and 2. Scenario #2: On R1: Router rip Ver ...
I contacted an instructor that I had worked with before, and he also indicated that "full mesh" (in the typical sense, meaning all routers connected to all others...[ n * (n-1) ] / 2) is not required (Leaving credit on Greg's earlier answer since he mentioned it first). Given ...