《美国法典》第 18 卷第 3238 条。虽然众所周知,审判地证明是政府案件的重要组成部分(United States v. Budge,359 F.2d 732, 734(7th Cir. 1966)),但在开创性的United States v. Jones,174 F.2d 746(7th Cir. 1949) 一案中,我们指出,审判地证明将足够,“[i]如果,根据全部证据, 可以合理地推断“该...
In: Jones CKRT, Kirchgraber U, Walther HO (eds) Dynamics Reported, vol 4 (New Series). Springer, Berlin, pp 60–129 Google Scholar Celletti A, Chierchia L (2007) KAM stability and celestial mechanics. Mem Amer Math Soc, 187(878), viii+134 pp Google Scholar Chierchia L (1986) ...
In: Jones CKRT, Kirchgraber U, Walther HO (eds) Dynamics Reported, vol 4 (New Series). Springer, Berlin, pp 60–129 Chapter Google Scholar Celletti A, Chierchia L (2007) KAM stability and celestial mechanics. Mem Amer Math Soc, 187(878), viii+134 pp Google Scholar Chierchia L (...
《美国法典》第 18 卷第 3238 条。虽然众所周知,审判地证明是政府案件的重要组成部分(United States v. Budge,359 F.2d 732, 734(7th Cir. 1966)),但在开创性的United States v. Jones,174 F.2d 746(7th Cir. 1949) 一案中,我们指出,审判地证明将足够,“[i]如果,根据全部证据, 可以合理地推断“该...