Team Bohnet suggested that people havetwo distinct and situation-specific modes of thinking, “System 1” and “System 2,”illustrated by University of Toronto’sKeith E. StanovichandRichard F. Westof James Mason University. These cognitive patterns can lead evaluators to selectincorrect decision nor...
Kahneman is careful to note that this division ismerely a modeland not to be taken literally. There are not sections of the brain with System 1 or System 2 stamped on them. We started with the question of statistical intuition. Intuition implies System 1. Statistics implies counterfactuals — ...
as Kahneman points out, lazy [11]. It takes a definite effort of will to use it, and it is never as fast as System 1. System 2 is usually too slow to work in real time; however, it is much more thorough and careful than System 1. In fight-or...
The book discusses each of these types of noise and their psychological aspects, drawing on earlier work such as Sunstein’s “nudge” and Kahneman’s “System 1 and 2” thinking。 Readers who are not somewhat familiar with this work might find a quick google search helpful。 There is also...
Such decisions are monitored and possibly supplemented, revised, or overridden in system 2, where thinking is slow and effortful and draws upon conscious evaluations of evidence in order to arrive at sound conclusions. Other two-system models have posited that the heuristics of system 1 are ...