Although Wikipedia can be a valuable resource, it is not considered a credible source for academic research. The site's articles are crowdsourced,...Become a member and unlock all Study Answers Start today. Try it now Create an account Ask a question Our experts can answer your tough ...
Wikipedia is a collaborative resource, which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses, for the purpos...
Mention Wikipedia within the walls of academy and you'll find no shortage of opinions.That-s no surprise.Can an online encyclopedia that is edited by anyone be trusted as a credible information source? Should students be encouraged to use this tool? And is it even possible to discourage its...
Mention Wikipedia within the walls of academy and you'll find no shortage of opinions.That-s no surprise.Can an online encyclopedia that is edited by anyone be trusted as a credible information source? Should students be encouraged to use this tool? And is it even possible to discourage its...
Mention Wikipedia within the walls of academy and you'll find no shortage of opinions.That-s no surprise.Can an online encyclopedia that is edited by anyone be trusted as a credible information source? Should students be encouraged to use this tool? And is it even possible to discourage its...
Why is Wikipedia not considered a credible source? How do you contextualize a quote and make it into a sentence? What does 'claim to fame' mean? How to cite the Federalist Papers. How can one reference information using Harvard Style? Give an example. ...
A well-respected organization (University presses are often credible) Selective with what they publish Some publishers, like Wikipedia, will let anyone share information. You need to be more careful with these sources. What Information Does the Source Include?
bing search results. it's the first stop for nearly everyone doing online research. the reason people rely on wikipedia, despite its imperfections, is that every claim is supposed to have citations. any sentence that isn't backed up with a credible source risks being slapped with the dreaded...
9 RegisterLog in Sign up with one click: Facebook Twitter Google Share on Facebook OT (redirected fromOral Testimony) Category filter: AcronymDefinition OTOff Topic(newsgroups, message boards, etc.) OTOld Testament OTOccupational Therapy
is, after all, the encyclopedia written by the people, for the people. Wikipedians are engaged in a constant fight to rid it not just of vandalism, but of all opinion and contentious material, of anything that cannot be described as fact and supported by a link to a recognised source. ...