While some researchers see open review as a good way to prevent offensive comments and stop plagiarism, others believe that courtesy or fear of retribution may cause referees to avoid or mitigate criticism. Usually, when we speak about open peer review, we actually mean the open id...
How good is peer review? [editorial; comment]Relman, A SAngell, MKelmatt AS, Angell M. How good is peer review? [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:827-9.Relman AS, Angell M: How good is peer review? (editorial). N Engl J Med 1989; 321:827-829....
Is peer review 翻译结果4复制译文编辑译文朗读译文返回顶部 The drafts are being 翻译结果5复制译文编辑译文朗读译文返回顶部 Is reviewing a draft 相关内容 aCitizenship-be cooperative;obey laws and rules[translate] a以至于出现了房地产泡沫现象 不動産泡現象は現われた[translate] ...
Peer review is an essential component of the process that is universally applied prior to the acceptance of a manuscript, grant or other scholarly work. Most of us willingly accept the responsibilities that come with being a reviewer but how comfortable are we with the process? Peer review is ...
【Para.4】A new study of the peer review process reveals a novel and depressing, if not totally surprising, fault. It indicates that a modern-day Albert Einstein, or any researcher with a good idea but without an already-stellar reputation, might struggle to get their foot in the door. ...
aHi! Good afternoon. My E-mail: ws166@yahoo.com 喂! 你好。 我的电子邮件: ws166@yahoo.com[translate] aWith Selection 以选择[translate] aA peer review system involving two or three reviewers is used to ensure high quality of manuscripts accepted for publication. The Editor-in-Chief and Edit...
The peer review process is seen as the gold standard in science because it ensures the rigor, novelty, and consistency of academic outputs. Typically, through rounds of review, flawed ideas are eliminated and good ideas are strengthened and improved. Peer reviewing also ensures that science is re...
aHi! Good afternoon. My E-mail: ws166@yahoo.com 喂! 你好。 我的电子邮件: ws166@yahoo.com [translate] aWith Selection 以选择 [translate] aA peer review system involving two or three reviewers is used to ensure high quality of manuscripts accepted for publication. The Editor-in-Chief and ...
Though peer review is central to science, the process itself has received little formal evaluation. Here we provide an Overview to the literature on the peer-review process. Peer review has its drawbacks, including financial cost, time, reliability, and potential biases. An important gap in our...
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? Selecting peer reviewers who will provide high-quality reviews is a central task of editors of biomedical journals.To determine the characteristics of revi... Black,Nick - 《Jama the Journal of the American Medical ...