法律方法论研究--IRAC方法及其逻辑辩护法律方法论研究I主持人手记l在本栏目的上一期(本刊2009年第5期)"主持人手记"中,我们提出法律方法论基本上包含三个层面的学..
Rather than repeating vague generalities about grammar and style or providing simple bullet-point lists as other writing guides do, this text breaks the well-known IRAC method of legal writing into comprehensible segments and gives students the tools needed to master their law exams. Finally, How ...
Meeting the Carnegie Report鈥檚 Challenge to Make Legal Analysis Explicit 鈥Subsidiary Skills to the IRAC FrameworkMiller, Nelson PCharles, Bradley J
5.克鲁珀克方法(CRuPAC Method)。这种方法是指“结论”(Conclusion)、“规则”(Rule)、证明“Proof”、 “分析”(Analysis)和“结论”(Conclusion)五个英文单词的缩写。与克里克方法一样,在这种方法中也有两 个“结论”,前一个结论显然是一个初步结论,与后一结论可能是相同的,也可能完全相反。值得注意的是, ...
F. (2009). Meeting the Carnegie Report's challenge to make legal analysis explicit - Subsidiary skills to the IRAC framework. Journal of Legal Education, 59, 192-224.Miller, N. P., & Charles, B. F. (2009). Meeting the Carnegie Report's challenge to make legal analysis explicit - ...
Based on a comprehensive review of legal writing textbooks and journal articles that have addressed how to organize a written legal analysis, this article identSocial Science Electronic Publishing