Think of Investing as a Game and End Up Feeling like a LoserTOO MANY INVESTORS TREAT investing as if it were a game. Theyfeel like they win if their...Stepleman, Robert
Diversify Game Offerings Players will be joining your casino for the games. Therefore, don't make them regret picking you. One reason online casinos are better than brick-and-mortar establishments is they provide a broad product range. Any decent site should have the basics, which are virtual ...
Investing in shares without a sound knowledge of the top companies in the market is a fatal error and many people have burnt their fingers in this game. Initially it appears as a calculated risk but later it often turns a gamble. Still, the golden rule is there which says - invest in ...
14. If you invest $1,000 in a stock, all you can lose is $1,000, but you stand to gain $10,000 or even %50,000 over time if you’re patient. The average person can concentrate on a few good companies, while the fund manager is forced to diversify. By owning too many stocks,...
Is Investing in Russia Still a Risky Game of Roulette?Read the full-text online article and more details about Is Investing in Russia Still a Risky Game of Roulette?.By DaleyJames
X is doing so and X is expert so lets’ follow and do it. Numbers look compelling and so I should go ahead. Easy peasy, however for X this might be an insignificant part of their overall game s even if it goes wrong their impact might be too small, maybe they have a side deal ...
The upshot is that trying to research and trade your own stocks, is likely to do better than $0 on average, but most likely worse than the index. Alex and Rob are earning prison wages - playing a loser's game even compared to working at McDonalds... unless you have ...
Against a background of passive investing in the ascendancy, I delve into the issue of whether active fund managers can add value through the prism of Sharpe's proposition that active investing is a zero sum game prior costs and negative sum game after costs. I explain some of the gaps in...
Investing is all about common sense. Owning a diversified portfolio of stocks and holding it for the long term is a winners game. Trying to beat the stock market is theoretically a zero-sum game (for every winner, there must be a loser), but after the substantial costs of investing are ...
Investing is a self-correcting game where non-viable strategies will disappear over the long run. And paying exorbitant premiums for founders with scaleup resumes is not viable. Why would I think so? Because there is a law in investing that not even all the money in the world and legions ...