Background—The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score predicts coronary heart disease (CHD) events, but methods for interpreting the score in combination with conventional CHD risk factors have not been established.Mark J. Pletcher, MD, MPH
A major challenge towards the construction of reference single-cell atlases is the integration of gene expression datasets produced from heterogeneous samples from multiple individuals, tissues, batches and generated using different protocols and technologies. Several computational methods have been developed t...
CAC T AT GT CTGTACGTCACGTGCACTA CTGCCAGGT GT TATAGA CG A CT A GC CA TA G CT GCCAGTCTGG T CA T AC C A TTA AATTG AGC G CG Enrichment -log(P) 3 2 1 0 Human Phenotypes Brain problem Recurrent bacterial infections Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma Bruising susceptibility ...
A single EST was identified that corresponds to one of the gamma gliadins containing seven cysteines, [GenBank: CAC94868.1]. ESTs corresponding to two gamma gliadins containing nine cysteines [GenBank: ACI04102.1, ACI04105.1] also were found, suggesting that these may also be expressed. None ...
Multivariable models using these factors predicted the presence of CAC (C statistic=0.789) and degree of elevation (16% of variation explained) and can be used to update a "pretest" CHD risk estimate, such as the 10-year Framingham Risk Score, that is based on an individual's conventional ...
What does a given score really mean? Although there is no standard approach, several methods exist to facilitate the interpretation of HRQL scores.Prinsen CALindeboom Rde Korte JThe Journal of investigative dermatology.Prinsen CAC, Lindeboom R, Korte J de. In- terpretation of Skindex-29 Scores:...
Each case instance may be analyzed to determine a corresponding hidden neuron contribution score, which may be used for clustering the cases instances into multiple instance clusters. For each instance cluster, a decision tree model may be generated, where a decision tree model comprises an ...
The average discrepancy in CAC score was 0.44 (range 0 - 5). There was no significant difference between the scores of the early and late groups.CONCLUSIONS: A learning curve was noted in detection and measurement of nodules, but not for CAC scoring, during the implementation of a lung ...