Three studies investigated the cost-effectiveness of VBPMM [41,42,43], all utilising cost calculator approaches. Malcolm et al. estimated that VBPMM in addition to standard care, compared to standard care alone,
(i.e., distortion of the probability according to the logit function purely due to the size of the building, rather than the economic viability of the alternative) and to be able to use the same utility function regardless of building size the costs are converted to specific cost per m2 ...
·annually in the primary energy of the cost-optimal level and to a transposition to variants with higher primary energy, lower levels of insulation thickness (decrease between 1 cm and 2 cm), lower number of window panes (from triple to double glazing) and consequently to lower embodied ...