This element complements the traditional JIF scores and data. The new indicator addresses the criticism against the short citation window for evaluating the performance of nearly 8,000 scholarly and professional journals on a medium term. Findings - It may be feasible that some of the other ...
This element complements the traditional JIF scores and data. The new indicator addresses the criticism against the short citation window for evaluating the performance of nearly 8,000 scholarly and professional journals on a medium term. Findings - It may be feasible that some of the other ...
Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores Impact factor (IF) is a commonly used surrogate for assessing the scientific quality of journals and articles. There is growing discontent in the medical c... R Jacques,DD ...
Ideally, pub- lished scientific results should be scrutinised by true experts in the field and given scores for quality and quantity according to established rules. In practice, however, what is called peer review is usually performed by committees with general competence rather than with the ...
The approach of submitting to journals in descending order of impact factor (IF) is a common but imperfect strategy. The validity of the IF as a measure of journal quality and significance is suspect, and a number of other journal impact scores have emerged, such tha...
h-indexes, Journal Impact Factors and CiteScores are often presented as a single numeric value, without providing any context. Under such circumstances, th... G Kendall - 《Publishing Research Quarterly》 被引量: 0发表: 2024年 2021 JCR Journal Impact Factors (SCI-Journals) 2021 JCR Impact Fac...
than three sdgs, the will take the top three best scores for consideration in the overall rank. data collection on the sdgs is challenging for an institution. while elsevier, via scopus data, provides the research component for each sdg, it is up to the institution to provide the rest. in...
Spouses showed a significantly greater difference in Time Dependence Burden scores than did nonspouses in both living arrangement groups, and nonspouses showed a significantly greater difference in Developmental Burden than did spouses in both groups. We conclude with a discussion of how programs can ...
Watch thisfree webinar with Dr. Philip Earisopens in new tab/window, Editor-in-Chief ofJouleopens in new tab/window,to learn more about developing your paper for publication in premium journals. Then you can add questions to theResearcher Academy Mendeley groupopens in new tab/windowthat were...
obtained minimum and maximum scores, respectively; acceptable 15%), and skewness (criterion, 1 to 1) were determined.28Scaling assumptions test the correct grouping of items and the appropriateness of a summed score. Scaling assumptions were checked by means of the item-domain correlation corrected...