Michelle L. DamaCarrie A. HallTanya M. Salman
Davis V. United States: Retroactivity and the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule In Davis v. United States, the Supreme Court held that evidence seized in violation of the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights is admissible at trial when ... EC Barbour - Library of Congress Congression...
There may also be others who received notice of their layoff within 15 days preceding June 27 or subsequent thereto. Members of this latter group might not have requested reconsideration under Rule 2-596 or section 12.01 of article XII of the Rules of the Civil Service Commission because it w...
were indicted in the circuit court of Kane County for the crime of armed robbery. After trial by jury, verdicts were returned finding them guilty as charged, and judgment was entered sentencing Flynn to the penitentiary for a term not less than two nor more than five years, and Y...
The Younger abstention doctrine is a judicial rule that prevents federal trial courts from exercising jurisdiction in certain circumstances. It requires federal courts to defer to pending state court proceedings, even if federal jurisdiction exists. The doctrine was originally intended to prevent non-inte...
Local Rule 83.6-11(c): I paid in full the discipline fees of the Indiana Supreme Court inMarch 2021 with my Biden Stimulus Payment. I have been suspended both by the Indiana Supreme Court and thisCourt, though this Court’s reciprocal suspension at Dkt. 4(3/21/2017) was entered on ...
The Supreme Court in McCray v. Illinois,386 U.S. 300, recognized the value of informers to law enforcement and assured that their identities under described circumstances need not be disclosed. Were this court to adopt a rule permitting a challenge to the evidence presented to the judicial offi...
court's ruling on the issue of summary judgment. Defendant argues that the trial court appropriately granted its motion for summary judgment because (1) the affidavit of plaintiff's attorney is defective since it violates Supreme Court Rule 191 (73 Ill.2d R. 191), and (2) there are no ...
In this case the supreme court of Illinois held that the doctrine of superstitious uses, arising from the statute of I Edward VI, chap. 14, under which devises for procuring the saying of Masses were held void, is not in force in Illinois and has never obtained in the United States; ...
MORE: Trump asks US Supreme Court to keep him on ballot in 14th Amendment case Former U.S. President Donald Trump waves as he departs for his second civil trial after E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, outside a Trump Tower in New York City...