From what I understand, the reviewer comments are in two parts: 1. A generic one-sentence comment about language editing 2. A list of editorial formatting comments How you write your response letter will depend on how the reviewer comments were written. So, for the first part, you ...
【油管搬运】How to Write the Discussion for a Scientific Paper 学术论文中discussion段落的写法 4603 51 9:04 App 【油管搬运】Academic Style (Academic Writing) 学术论文写作风格 1.4万 12 10:08 App 【油管搬运】What is Academic Writing? 英文学术写作的基础五要素 1287 -- 6:57 App 【油管搬运】提高...
这个时候你可以说:“We agree with the reviewer that this was poorly described. What we meant was… ” “我们同意审阅人的意见,在这一点上确实描述的不够确切,我们真正的意图是。。。” 如果你想在文章中加入大篇幅来补充说明,那么在回复中复制出来你要添加的这一部分:“We added the following paragraph ...
Four simple tips to help you respond to reviewers’ comments and fast track your paper for a positive decision
How NOT to answer negative reviews When you’re responding to a review, try not to appear confrontational, accusatory, angry, or emotional. A public fight with a customer could make you look unprofessional, so avoid: Using sly or backhanded language to insult the reviewer ...
(所以,读者也会有可能造成同样的误解,那么这个有可能就是你的问题了)。这个时候你可以说:“We agree with the reviewer that this was poorly described. What we meant was… ” “我们同意审阅人的意见,在这一点上确实描述的不够确切,我们真正的意图是。。。”...
Four simple tips to help you respond to reviewers’ comments and fast track your paper for a positive decision
It; 's never a good idea to double-down. This negative review response is just stirring the pot. Neither the reviewer nor potential customers will be inclined to visit this establishment again. Source: Google Reviews It might be hard to say you’re sorry when you're agitated. However, ...
As an experienced academic report reviewer, Dr Bo Cui gave an enlightening presentation on the ideal way to respond to peer reviewer comments and use the feedback constructively. He also talked about how secondary data can be utilized. The workshop had 100 attendees, including...
In this first article, the authors address the question of how to respond to a request for revisions after review, including the quandary of how best to respond to conflicting feedback.doi:10.1007/s10459-023-10213-2patoSpringer NetherlandsAdvances in Health Sciences Education...