Peer review is a process in which a paper's validity, originality and academic content are checked prior to publication in a good journal. In other words, it is 'evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies'. The people who carry out this work are called reviewers ...
3.3 How to peer review a review articleresearcheracademy.elsevier.com/navigating-peer-review/certified-peer-reviewer-course/33-peer-review-review-article 因为是全英文授课,我自己记录课程讲义并做了中文翻译,只是记课堂笔记,顺便发出来方便有需要的人。 前面一部分是判断要不要接受审稿的过程,直接跳过,贴...
The peer review process is a quality control for scientific publication. Well done, it helps editors to improve their journals and protects readers from wasting time on ill-conceived, redundant, irrelevant or erroneous literature. Badly done it can act as an obstacle to innovation. This article ...
How to peer review Become a reviewer Reviewer Recognition Reviewer Resources You’ve received or accepted an invitation to review an article. Now the work begins. Here are some guidelines and a step by step guide to help you conduct your peer review. ...
When creating an assignment, you can require students to complete a peer review of another student's work. Learn more aboutpeer review assignments. For peer reviews, you canmanually assignpeer reviews or choose to have Canvasautomatically assignpeer reviews for you. You can also choose to allow...
Avoiding second-hand criticism will obviate arguments and give the other person a chance to tell their side of the story. 38 Explain the consequences of the appraisee’s actions. Most people do not set out to be a nuisance and may honestly believe that their way of doing something is best...
Detail, clarity and a constructive approach: all these are key to a helpful review, writes Sophie Inge
This peer review tutorial will give you the skills needed to evaluate another researcher’s manuscript in a way that will help a journal Editor make a decision about publication.
Once you have accepted to peer review, the next step is to evaluate the manuscript. To evaluate the manuscript as a peer reviewer,experienced reviewers recommendyou read the paper three times. Give yourself time to think about the research in between each reading. ...
2.Review Decision: Accept:Paper is well written and a significant contribution to the literature. Minor Revisions:Issues that must be addressed by the author(s) before publication in order to adhere to scientific reporting standards, or issues affecting clarity. ...