How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine . . . and other journals. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):281-284.Estrada CA, Adina Kalet A, Smith W, Chin MH, 2006. How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine...and oth...
Tools & resources Articles from Reviewers' Update Connect Paving the way to increase diversity in journals – and research
The “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals” by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) states that editors should not have a COI that could lead to bias or the appearance of bias in decision making: “E...
aThe lecture name is “How to write paper in English”.1. Construct of the English paper2. How can we write the paper be accepted easily3. Journals reviewer that you have been invited to serve, introduce some this journals4. Journals and Main or Associate Editors that you have been invite...
The titles of the target journals that you intend to submit your manuscript to All tables and figures Any previous reviewer comments The manuscript’s list of references Within 1 working day of placing your orderInternational Science Editingwill send you an email confirming your order details. Typic...
This process is discussed in the section Evaluating the Job Offer. Things to consider Know where to find job ads for the type of position you seek. The journals Science and Nature are the venues where all large research universities advertise faculty jobs. However, The Chronicle of Higher ...
Reviewer gender, seniority, and academic productivity had no effect on acceptance rate. Reviewers from China accepted a higher proportion of invitations than did reviewers from any other country. Individuals who had accepted an invitation were more likely to accept a second invitation for a different...
How to write a review.如何些综述文章,英文版
How to review critically, but fairly You should be an expert at this by now, because you’ve been reading and thinking about papers nonstop since the beginning of graduate school. The process is basically the same for reviewing, except that a reviewer must be even more thorough. Here are ...
that the reviewer has been careful to address all of the original article’s main points and supporting evidence. Take what you get from the article and apply it to what you already know about the topic. Do this at least twice to ensure that you cover all of the most important ...