百度试题 结果1 题目Would you explain how chief justice John Roberts could flub the oath of office.相关知识点: 试题来源: 解析 你能解释为什么美国最高法院首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨可能犯的错上宣誓就职.反馈 收藏
Since John Roberts has been chief justice, the petitioner has won 68 percent of cases, so CourtCast’s 70 percent isn’t exactly better than just picking the favorites. But again, CourtCast is flying nearly blind. It has no idea what a given case is even about; it’s using just the ...
The agency's leadership by a single director removable only for inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance violates the separation of powers, but that provision is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act, wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in his opinion for the Court. What Is the Olive Branch Petition? T...
Roberts, Jr.'s majority opinion in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. The decision was feted by President Obama, liberal politicians, activists, and citizens who feared the Supreme Court would use its judicial review powers to invalidate the signature achievement of the United ...
In its 6-3 decision siding against the SEC, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, stated, "A defendant facing a fraud suit has the right to be tried by a jury of his peers before a neutral adjudicator."18Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, emphasiz...
some of the uneasiness stems from what feels like a contradictory message from the court, rim says. in his majority opinion, chief justice john roberts jr., said the ruling shouldn't be construed "as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his ...
“Then when the courts stop you, stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did,” Vance said, citing a (possibly apocryphal) quotation long attributed to America’s seventh president, “and say, ‘The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.’” In his U-turning path...
"[N]othing prohibits universities from considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected the applicant's life, so long as that discussion is concretely tied to a quality of character or unique ability that the particular applicant can contribute to the university," Roberts wrote. New ...
Death by Adjective: The Supreme Court’s Attack on Legislative Regulations of Violence, or, How Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia Stopped Worrying about Symbolic Violence by Employing Aesthetic Claims to Limit Legislative Restrictions on Violence PreviewView full textDownload full...
In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., said the ruling shouldn't be construed "as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise." But he added that colleges may...