1. 根据句意“___是一项很好的锻炼”,结合备选词,只有Walking符合句意,构成Walking is good exercise. 散步是一项很好的锻炼。 2. 根据句意“你会用___吗?”,结合备选词,只有chopsticks符合句意,构成Can you use chopsticks? 你会用筷子吗? 3. 根据句意“看!这么多___动物的照片。”,结合备选词,只...
( )5. How can we get there? --___ Walking is good for us.A. On foot.B. By bus.C. By car 相关知识点: 试题来源: 解析 A 题目询问如何到达目的地,并提示步行对我们有益。选项中只有 "On foot" 表示步行,符合提示,因此正确答案为 A. On foot.反馈...
Good for the mind and body The physical benefits of dog walking are well known, but it's also known to have therapeutic effects as well. That is vital because the World Health Organization has emphasized the importance of a strong mental health response to COVID-19. Doyle sai...
a你能帮他学数学吗 You can help him to study mathematics[translate] a故事是怎么结尾的? How is the story the ending?[translate] a我也一直不知道有个你 I also did not know has you[translate] awalking is good for how to keep healthy 走是好为了怎样能保持健康[translate]...
Ever heard of “slow walking”? It may sound too good to be true, but simply walking slowly and consciously is good for your health. Not only does it burn a surprising number of calories and decrease joint stress, but also it adds an element of meditation and mental well-being to our ...
七、用括号里所给词的适当形式填空。1.(walk) is good exercise.2.How many(way) to go to school?3. My parent often(go)to work by subway.4.-How Tom(come)to school?-He(come) by bike.5.What are they(talk) about? 相关知识点: 试题来源: 解析 七、1.Walking 2.ways 3.goes 4.d...
Ⅲ. 单项选择。(10分)( )1. -How can we get there? -___ Walking is good for us.A. By bu
body. It has a positive influence on your hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which is your central nervous response system. This is good because the HPA axis is responsible for your stress response. When you exercise by walking, you calm your nerves, which can make you feel less ...
First,we should always think about the positive thing.Second,we should take exercise everyday to keep a good state of mind.Third, we should have a good sleep every night.And we should learn to relax.We can read some interesting books after class or work.And we can watch some...
doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(19)31532-5JonathonReviewKeatsReviewNew Scientist