In November of 1994, Walter John and Pauline Zile were charged with the first-degree murder of...Kidwell, David
A ruling in Trump's favor would bring the prosecution to an end. But if Smith prevails and Trump's claims of immunity are rejected, proceedings in the case, which have been paused for months, would pick back up, although it's unclear how quickly it would go to trial. A victory for t...
The Supreme Court says a document was "inadvertently" uploaded to its site Wednesday after Bloomberg reported the opinion on a highly anticipated abortion case was briefly posted online. The case centers on Idaho's near-total abortion ban
On Wednesday, gun rights is back at the Supreme Court for the first time in over a decade. The justices will be weighing the constitutionality of a New York law that imposes limits on carrying guns outside the home, setting up a showdown over just how far the Second Amendment goe...
Another good example was that in dealing with a cutting-edge case, a judge in charge (承办法官) asked all interns in the court to search for similar cases from the United States, because he knew, as an SPC judge, that there was no precedent for reference in China. The SPC regulation ...
Choices in Context: How Case-Level Factors Shape Preference-Based Behavior on the US Supreme CourtBartels, Brandon LBartels, Brandon L. 2008. "Choices in Context: How Case-Level Factors Shape Preference- Based Behavior on the U.S. Supreme Court." Unpublished Manuscript....
The justices of the Supreme Court are scheduled to discuss whether to take up the Game of Life case at a private conference on Jan. 7. Typically, the decision on granting or denying certiorari comes within days of conference (although other actions, such as deferral ...
“The Everson decision added a new twist to the First Amendment which has been used by the Court to remove God from practically all civil government matters, even though the Court also incorrectly declared that the First Amendment was meant to separate God and state. Christian political activists...
with punishments such as fines or a 30-day jail sentence — just as the small Oregon town involved in the case did — because the court decided these penalties "are not designed" to inflict "terror, pain, or disgrace," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion...
risk aversionWellbutrinFTC v. Actavis was one of the most important antitrust cases of the modern era. In one fell swoop, the Supreme Court ensconced antitrust's role in analyzing setCarrier, Michael ASocial Science Electronic Publishing