The jurisdiction exercised by the High Courts in India under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is called the revisional jurisdiction of the High Courts. It has been conferred on the High Courts for effective exercise of the High Court's superintending and visitorial powers over...
The definition of the term High Court allows for certainty regarding the territorial jurisdiction of the High Courts. However, the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as TRA), read along with the Trade Marks Act, 1999(hereinafter referred to as the Act)...
Bar & Bench is India’s leading online platform for comprehensive legal news, providing up-to-date coverage of the Supreme Court, High Courts, and significant legal developments. Our portal offers breaking news, in-depth analysis, expert interviews, and
High Court remands back matter relating to levy of GST on transfer/assignment of Leasehold rights directing Department to consider Gujarat HC Judgment Bimal Jain30 January 2025 at 10:27 The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Panacea Biotec Limited Vs Union of India & Ors [Writ Petition...
The taxpayer submitted that Customs had committed an error of law and exceeded its jurisdiction for failing to take into account the relevant facts and legal principles in raising the BOD, namely that: The registration of a GST group is not an automatic process. ...
Book appointment and consultation with high court advocate in lucknow who handle cases related to civil matters, criminal matter and other litigation.
Best High Court Advocates Ahmedabad - Chetan K Pandya is world no 1 famous top senior criminal lawyers, high court lawyer and best advocates in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, india for legal services like Divorce & Criminal Cases, Central Excise and Customs Act, Be
Dear Colleagues Seniors I had enrolled in Telangana Bar council and practicing Advocate in Telangana High Court Can the advocate get computer code in other High
Book appointment and consultation with high court advocate in lucknow who handle cases related to civil matters, criminal matter and other litigation.
The MRT determined that it lacked jurisdiction to review the application, which was lodged out of time.[7] The appellant appealed the decision of the MRT to the Federal Circuit Court, who dismissed the appeal. In 2014, the appellant applied unsuccessfully for a protection visa. He applied ...