Cases Pending in High Courts and Supreme CourtSneha MukharjeePrint this
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The Oregon Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from 13 counties in a long-running $1 billion lawsuit over timber revenue and what constitutes “the greatest permanent value” when it comes to forest management.
On Wednesday 18 October 2023, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Vanderstock & Anor v State of Victoria [2023] HCA 30.
She says the two cases before the High Court have made it more abundantly clear that when deciding whether a worker is a contractor or an employee–what’s in the written contract carries the most weight. “There was a period there where the courts were having regard to a number of factor...
Real Estate attorney Alexander Lycoyannis was quoted in a Law360 article about the future of legal challenges to New York's rent regulation laws following recent U.S. Supreme Court denials of certiorari. The article explored potential strategies for future lawsuits, emphasizing the need for...
"Although there are numerous close cases chronicled in the Supreme Court's and our current Establishment Clause caselaw, this case is not one of them," Circuit Judge Milan Smith wrote for a three-judge panel, which upheld a lower court ruling. Kennedy plans to appea...
(展开全部) 我要写书评 High Court of Justice Cases, Including的书评 ···(全部 0 条) + 加入购书单 谁读这本书?··· 二手市场· ··· 在豆瓣转让手里有一本闲着? 订阅关于High Court of Justice Cases, Including的评论: feed: rss 2.0...
By countering a simplistic narrative around school attendance as an adequate measure of children’s learning and participation in education, these Delhi High Court cases foreground marginal children’s primary identity as learners. They thus help expose how the current fuzziness around children’s ...
Dan Diffley, Jack Cummings, George Abney, Andy Tuck, and Mike Barry are mentioned for representing the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Nevertheless, the Patents Act 1977 forms the legal basis for the current judgment of the UK High Court (case ID: CH-2022-000144). The current case concerned the application of section 1(2)(c) of the Patents Act 1977 which excludes from patent protection “a program for a computer … ...