I don't understand added-together SEER ratings for mulitiple individual pieces of equipment and in my opinion that would be a misleading tactic, perhaps intended as a sales gimmick. Give the manufacturer a call and let us know what they say. ...
29,44) have been masked out to prevent misleading effect3. The use of LMST criterion (c) is due to the tolerance of polar marine species on SSTs lower than LMST83. Applying LMST allows us to eliminate MHWs in wintertime when SSTA satisfies the criteria (a) and (b), but the SST is...
Actually that's the very formula which sprung me into action, as I was dumbfounded by some tests in debug mode where buildings with a higher conductivity would exchange less heat than the same building with lower conductivity in the same conditions (because capacity also played a role, but on...
Nonetheless, researchers believe that the constant Reynolds number basis can be misleading since the net result for the constant Reynolds number comparison combines the nanofluid property effect and the flow velocity effect [90]. In the interpretation of nanofluid CHT, Buschmann et al. [17] argued ...
The WBGT is a widespread index in indoor and outdoor occupational settings and incorporates environmental temperature, humidity, wind speed, and heat radiation (ISO 7243: 2017) [54]. The international standard for the WBGT uses a formula based on measurements of three temperature variables: Ta, ...
Rather, the single viscosity values are computed either through the use of viscometer/rheometer, which could be misleading when being used in analytical relations to calculate the desired properties of the heat transfer systems. As in the heat transfer systems, the working fluid (nanofluid) ...
In this study, to improve the quality of a live attenuated vaccine for duck viral hepatitis (DHV), the lyophilization of a heat-resistant duck hepatitis virus vaccine was optimized. The optimized heat protectors were made of 10% sucrose, 1.2% pullulan, 0
The authors also indicated that comparing nanofluids on the basis of non-dimensional parameters such as the Reynolds number is misleading in drawing a correct conclusion on the real heat transfer enhancement. Furthermore, Haddad et al. [218] reviewed natural convection using nanofluids. They ...
Figure 8c could be misleading, but if one looks at it closely, it is evident that the temperature span was narrow; thus, small variations in surface temperature appear as considerable. Camera parameters were set to reflected temperature 25.0 °C, RH 60%, and atmospheric temperature 22.5 °C....