“must have +过去分词”结构用以对已经发生的事情作以肯定的推测,意为:想必已经,一定已经;or 在此句相当于一个虚拟条件句= lf he had not had an accident;表示与过去事实相反,从句用 had+过去分词,主句是: would/ should/ might/ could + have +过去分词。故选A。
解析:本题主要考查两点:1)must have +过 去分词 这个结构用以对已经发生的事情作以肯定 的推测,意为:想必已经...;一定已经... ...;2)or在此句相当于一个虚拟条件句=If he had not had an accident ;表示与过去事实相 反,if从句用had+过去分词(此句用or表示 了),主句是:would/ should/ might/...
he must have had an accident,or he should have been here then他一定出事故了,要不然他当时会在这儿了语言点:1.must have + 过去分词 这个结构用以对已经发生的事情作以肯定的推测,意为:想必已经.一定已经.2.or 在此句相当于一个虚拟条件句.= If he had not had an accident3.表示与过去事实相反,if...
He must have had an accident,or he___ here then 这句是虚拟语气句 had reached对过去的虚拟 从句 had done ,主句 would,must ,could +have done我个人的理解 o(∩_∩)o... 31464 he must have had an accident,or he should have been here then.求详解 he must have had an accident,or he ...
[题目]Hemusthaveha...【题目】He must have had an accident, or he here then. would have been B. had been C. should be D. could be 【答案】A 【解析】句意:他一定是发生了事故,否则他那个时候应该已经到这儿了。or可以表示同过去事实相反的非真实条件,即or后面的句子用虚拟语气,谓语用would/...
解析:前半句推断他必定出了事故,or暗含一种与事实相反的假设条件,即if he had not had an accident,因此D为正确答案。 答案解析 1. Finding a job can be a long and ___(pain). 应填入形容词 painful,表示找工作是一个漫长而痛苦的过程。 2. Smoking is ___to health, so please tell your paren...
had to be hereC. should be here D. would be here 答案 A[解析] 虚拟语气题。与过去事实相反的假设,主句常用would/should have done,从句用过去完成时。 结果三 题目 He must have had an accident, or he () then. A. would have been here B. had to be here C. should be here D. w...
【题目】He must have had an accident, or he here then. would have been B. had been C. should be D. could be试题答案 在线课程 【答案】A 【解析】句意:他一定是发生了事故,否则他那个时候应该已经到这儿了。or可以表示同过去事实相反的非真实条件,即or后面的句子用虚拟语气,谓语用would/...
he must have had an accident,or he should have been here then 他一定出事故了,要不然他当时会在这儿了 语言点：1.must have + 过去分词 这个结构用以对已经发生的事情作以肯定的推测,意为：想必已经.一定已经.2.or 在此句相当于一个虚拟条件句.= If he had not had an accident 3.表示...
he must have had an accident, or he should have been here then 他一定出事故了， 要不然他当时会在这儿了 语言点：1. must have + 过去分词 这个结构用以对已经发生的事情作以肯定的推测， 意为： 想必已经。。。 一定已经。。。2. or 在此句相当于一个虚拟条件句。= If he had no...