restricting expression—a manager can be sanctioned for announcing that his company will no longer hire women, for example—the claim that anyone can oppress others with their speech in a sense that warrants legal regulation is a controversial one, at least in the US context that McGowan in...
LINGUISTIC DISARMAMENT: ON HOW HATE SPEECH FUNCTIONS, THE WAY HATE WORDS CAN BE RECLAIMED, AND WHY WE MUST PURSUE THEIR RECLAMATION government restrict free speech and association, saying it called on authorities "to provide the necessary guarantees so that such [free speech] rights are not misuse...
To pick up on Horton’s own example, an understanding of the reasons why someone might feel shame may be of use to a political strategy designed to reduce hate speech by extra-legal means. Thus, when I talk about self-restraint, I mean to include both of Horton’s categories of self-...
This paper looks at the tools available on an international and European level in relation to the legal regulation of hate speech. More particularly, it considers the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discri...
The Internet and the Family: The View From Parents The View From the Press - Turow - 1999 () Citation Context ...asily accessed on-line pornography, violence, and hate speech. Newspaper and magazine articles have fed this fear ... Joseph Turow,John Bracken,Lilach Nir - 《On the Interne...
hate crime in those countries where speeches are protected as part of speech and expression liberty but at the same time creating threat to the law and order.This paper is an exploration of the various issues relating to hate crime and hate speech on one hand and related violence on other....
‘Hate speech’ is the most common keyword used in this subject by the scientific community, since it is also a legal term in many countries. The terms ‘offensive’ and ‘abusive’ were also added as previously mentioned since they convey a similar idea, in the sense that HS can be ...
much as we should today. In fact, we seem to be witnessing a politically correct philosophy at play, one shared by both the extreme left and the extreme right, which aims to stifle all expression that doesn’t fit within their parameters of what they consider to be “a...
Second, the idea of “unregulated speech” is controversial and has been a reason for harming human dignity and making the public discourse inimical to social order. Third, there should be a legal, moral and rational reconciliation between exercising ‘speech limitations’ and ‘free speech’ to ...
Hatred towards particular groups has existed for a long time in human history. Legal experts, such as Mari Matsuda [5], back in the 1980s, introduced the termracist speech, which espouses ethnic inferiority, targets historically oppressed groups, and is hateful and condescending. In subsequent ye...