错误在于头文件冲突。程序开头不#include重复的头文件或者删除存在重复的头文件中重复的声明。
如题,在进行sx1278驱动移植时报错很多个"IRQn" has already been declared in the current scope, 发现问题是在stm32f10x.h和stm32f103xe.h中重复定义了很多个这样的中断向量,为什么会同时调用这两个头文件呢? 原来是在这两个文件中包含的头文件写错了 我使用的单片机芯片为STM32F103RCT6,而要包含... 查看原文 ...
Expected diagnostics: error: “x” has already been declared in the current scope Actual diagnostics: nothing Version: 19.29.30133 C11: If the declarator or type specifier that declares the identifier appears inside a block or within the list of parameter declarations in ...
keil编译发生错误#include <stdio.h>#include <stdlib.h>... // 标头档#define Result_TIMOUT 3#define Result_INTIAL 0#define Result_ERROR 1... // 预处理typedef enum{ MD_INIT, HARDWARE_CHECK, F.。
一、问题 使用 GD32F10x_Firmware_Library_V2.2.2 固件库样例工程 Template 修改设备型号为 GD32F103RC 编译报以下错误: 二...
如题,在进行sx1278驱动移植时报错很多个"IRQn" has already been declared in the current scope,发现问题是在stm32f10x.h和stm32f103xe.h中重复定义了很多个这样的中断向量,为什么会同时调用这两个头文件呢?原来是在这两个文件中包含的头文件写错了我使用的单片机芯片为STM32F103RCT6,而要包含的头文件并不是s....
Error[Pe101]: ''PAL_IOLSTATE_NOREQUEST'' has already been declared in the current scope Error[Pe101]: ''PAL_IOLSTATE_ACTIVE_REQUEST'' has already been declared in the current scope (at line 487) Error[Pe101]: ''PAL_IOLSTATE_APP_ACTIVE'' has already been declared in the current...
".../include/json/include/nlohmann/detail/iterators/iteration_proxy.hpp", line 151: error: "tuple_size" has already been declared in the current scope class tuple_size<::nlohmann::detail::iteration_proxy_value<IteratorType>> ^ As can be seen, the error originates from the header-file iter...
Open in MATLAB Online I wanted to use optimization toolbox, but when I run the intiallization.m of each toolbox. Unfortunatly, I have got this error "has already been declared within this scope." even though I save the intialization exactily like the name of function. ...
Same problem cc-1101 CC: ERROR File = commands.cc, Line = 1415 "i" has already been declared in the current scope. for (uint i= 0; i < instance_options_map.records; ++i) ^ Just declaren "uint i= 0;" in line 1390 and just use i=0 in the both for loops around line 1394 ...