(Cn) ), which are semantically equivalent to the first GROUP BY example and have a more clear syntax. GROUP BY [ALL/DISTINCT] is only allowed in a simple GROUP BY clause that contains column expressions. It isn't allowed with the GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, CUBE, WITH CUBE or WITH ROLLUP ...
Agrouping-setsspecification allows multiple grouping clauses to be specified in a single statement. This can be thought of as the union of two or more groups of rows into a single result set. It is logically equivalent to the union of multiple subselects with the group by clause in each s...
(including the related notes and schedules thereto) fairly presents, or will fairly present, the financial position of Sky and its Subsidiaries as of its date, and each of the statements of income or results of operations and changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows or equivalent ...
the latest valuation date of any Plan; and (vii) no liability under any Title IV Plan has been satisfied with the purchase of a contract from an insurance company that is not rated AAA by the Standard & Poor's Corporation or an equivalent rating by another nationally recognized rating ...
- Bachelor's or Master's degree in in Computer Science, Engineering, Mathematics, and Statistics or equivalent subject - Minimum 4 years of experience in Supply Chain, Finance or Commercial operations or Analytics (Business Intelligence, Data Engineering or Data Warehousing). ...
(Cn) ), which are semantically equivalent to the first GROUP BY example and have a more clear syntax. GROUP BY [ALL/DISTINCT] is only allowed in a simple GROUP BY clause that contains column expressions. It isn't allowed with the GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, CUBE, WITH CUBE or WITH ROLLUP ...
(Cn) ), which are semantically equivalent to the first GROUP BY example and have a more clear syntax. GROUP BY [ALL/DISTINCT] is only allowed in a simple GROUP BY clause that contains column expressions. It isn't allowed with the GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, CUBE, WITH CUBE or WITH ROLLUP ...
(Cn) ), which are semantically equivalent to the first GROUP BY example and have a more clear syntax. GROUP BY [ALL/DISTINCT] is only allowed in a simple GROUP BY clause that contains column expressions. It isn't allowed with the GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, CUBE, WITH CUBE or WITH ROLLUP ...
(C1, C2, ...Cn))is allowed in the SQL-2006 standard but not in Transact-SQL. Transact-SQL allowsGROUP BY GROUPING SETS( A1, A2,...An, C1, C2, ...Cn )orGROUP BY GROUPING SETS( (A1), (A2), ... (An), (C1), (C2), ... (Cn) ), which are semantically equivalent to ...
(Cn) ), which are semantically equivalent to the first GROUP BY example and have a more clear syntax. GROUP BY [ALL/DISTINCT] is only allowed in a simple GROUP BY clause that contains column expressions. It isn't allowed with the GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP, CUBE, WITH CUBE or WITH ROLLUP ...