Journals may decide, instead, to rely on post-publication peer review by archive users. Most preprint servers allow for comments (and subsequent corrections of the preprint) to be added. There may well be further developments in this regard, including inclusion of new data in a review as a m...
In the event that the manuscript is accepted pending revision, authors are asked to address reviewer comments. When the authors submit a revised manuscript, the revised version is usually sent to the original peer reviewers for a second review. At the end of the peer review process, the ...
aThe public peer review comments are available to all [12]. 公开同事评审评论是可利用的到所有 (12)。 [translate] anot all machine parts in use are standardized 不是所有的机器零件在使用中被规范化 [translate] acan we walk along all of the Great Wall? 我们可以沿所有长城走? [translate] ...
There are many types of peer review, but they tend to fall into two broad categories: blind, in which the identities of at least one group of participants (such as authors or reviewers) are hidden from the other groups; or open, in which all participants know each others’ identities. Wh...
Presents rules to make peer reviewing more useful to authors and editors alike. Power of peer reviewers; Why peer review tends to be uneven in quality; Basic structure of the task; How to make constructive comments.ChiltonStephenAcademeChilton, S. (1999). The good reviewer. Academe, 85(6),...
understanding that additional review by the Journal of Applied Physics may occur. The Journal requires a clear copy of the revised manuscript and a cover letter indicating the exact location of the revision(s), so that the editors can see whether you have complied with the reviewer's comments....
Journal clubs are an excellent way to improve your critical reading skills, as well as help from your mentor. Browse the comments on PeerJ, PubPeer and PubMed Commons to see how other scientists approach reviewing a paper. I’ve also found that the best way of improving my review abilities...
Open Peer Review While some researchers see open review as a good way to prevent offensive comments and stop plagiarism, others believe that courtesy or fear of retribution may cause referees to avoid or mitigate criticism. Usually, when we speak about open peer review, we actually ...
First,the publish-first lifecycle could be exploited by cranks.Ifthe willingness to undergo peer-review is the mark of seriousness in a researcher— and if non-serious researchers are unwilling to face that gauntlet — then a venue that lets you make an end-run around peer-review is an obvi...
and decide whether to continue to use them. This course of action raises the question of how new reviewers might learn their trade. It may be time for journals to start training their reviewers—though this assumes peer review is worthwhile and that people can be trained. Meanwhile, one sugge...