Yes, 3DMark TimeSpy is a good benchmark. Here are the results of other users running TimeSpy (not Extreme) on a 3700X and a single 2080 Super: https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/cpugpu/spy/P/2479/1290/500000?minScore=0&cpuName=AMD Ryzen 7...
3DMark Time Spy (GPU score) 8,071 9,644 8,629 8,513 Red Dead Redemption 2 59 fps 68 fps 65 fps 62 fps Fortnite 98 fps 137 fps 132 fps 105 fps Assassin’s Creed Valhalla 71 fps 83 fps 64 fps 66 fps Battlefield V 120 fps 139 fps 123 fps 120 fps Civilization VI 138 fps 161...
the performance metrics rarely make sense, and it's only good for thermal stress tests where you need a consistently high load. I'd ask to see a video of the card running something actually somewhat representative like 3DMark Time Spy to check for artifacting and compare the score to ...
3DMark Time Spy scored 14,327 (second lowest), while in Fire Strike Extreme, the 16,938 score is average even among DDR5 boards. Here again, with DDR4, the difference between the tested DDR5 boards is negligible. Power Consumption / VRM Temperatures (Image credit: Tom's Hardware) We used...
The most concrete information we have right now is a comparison to AMD’s 5600M. Apple says the M1 Pro with 16 GPU cores offers 2.5x the performance, while the M1 Max with 32 cores offers 4x the performance. In 3DMark Time Spy, machines with a 5600M average a combined score of 6,02...
the limit and see its true potential. And this typically refers to a video game scene with loads of visuals or one that might be in a video game for graphics cards. The latter is referred to as a synthetic benchmark, and there are many options, includingPassMark,3DMark, andUnigine ...