Because of the GFW, cloning repositories from github is very slow for me. So I tried boosting the speed of cloning with proxychains and it used to work quite well. However, an error occurs when I clone with proxychains in recent months: ...
git config --global --unset https.proxy sock5代理: git config --global http.proxy 'socks5://192.168.1.110:1080' git config --global https.proxy 'socks5://192.168.1.110:1080' 该种方式,对于git clone 后面的网址进行dns时不对dns服务进行代理 或 git config --global http.proxy 'socks5h://...
完美解决 fatal: unable to access ' https://github.com/.../.git': Could not resolve host: http://github.com只需要在命令行中执行 git config --global --unset http.proxy git config --global --un…
git config --global --unset http.proxy git config --global --unset https.proxy sock5代理: git config --global http.proxy 'socks5://192.168.1.103:1080' git config --global https.proxy 'socks5://192.168.1.103:1080' 该种方式,对于git clone 后面的网址进行dns时不对dns服务进行代理 或 git ...
HTTP 形式:git clonehttps://github.com/PBK-B/test.git SSH 形式:git clone git@github.com:PBK-B/test.git 一、HTTP 形式 走HTTP 代理 git config --global http.proxy "http://127.0.0.1:8080" git config --global https.proxy "http://127.0.0.1:8080" ...
git clone 设置临时的 proxy ss.sh #!/bin/env bashBASEDIR=$(dirname"$0")cd$BASEDIRdisable_proxy() { git config --global --unsethttps.proxy }trapdisable_proxy INT git config --global https.proxy http://127.0.0.1:1080 ss-local -c ./config.json...
解决因为http_proxy代理导致的git clone失败的问题:OpenSSL SSL_connect: SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL in connection to xxx:443,这个也已经设置了:gitconfig--global.sslVerifyfalse
$ echo $https_proxy 取消代理 $ unset http_proxy $ unset https_proxy $ unset ftp_proxy $ unset rsync_proxy Mac 查看代理端口号 一般情况代理端口号是在 System Preferences -> Network -> Advanced -> Proxies 中查看,如图: 编辑 切换为居中 ...
git clone https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.git error: gnutls_handshake() failed: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. 在这里找到答案,在proxy以后,gnutls工作非常奇怪,但是openssl能工作很好。 因此按照此步骤,重新编译git sudo apt-getupdate ...
E.g. checkout, clone, reset, sparse-checkout, etc. Note: Parallel checkout usually delivers better performance for repositories located on SSDs or over NFS. For repositories on spinning disks and/or machines with a small number of cores, the default sequential checkout often performs better....