Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) Max temp 92°C Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° Fan: 75% razor1792013/02/08 at 23:16 Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. http://www.ozone3d.net...
Here are the charts ofFurMarkscores forAMD RadeonandNVIDIA GeForcegraphics cards (andIntel HD GraphicsGPUs as well). These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score withFurMark 1.9.xand FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Each entry includes...
More details are availableHERE. You can download Cinebench 2024 fromTHIS PAGE. I did a quick test with the following system: –CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X –RAM: 16GB DDR4 3200MHz –GPU: ASUS TUF Radeon RX 7900 XT (stock clock speeds) –Windows 10 + Adrenalin 23.8.2 GPU score:13868 points ...
2736 points (45FPS) – Sapphire HD 5850,Linux Mint 13, FRGLX (8.982) 2622 points (43FPS) – MSI GTX 660 Hawk,LinuxMint 13 64-bit, R304.64 820 points (13FPS) – GeForce GT 650M,OSX 10.8, MacBook Pro 15-inch, Retina display 728 points (12FPS) – Sapphire HD 5850,L...
Here is the score when I launch FurMark.exe:2234points And now, the score when FurMark.exe is renamed in… ati.exe (why not?):4383points This score is almost twice the first one. Thatexplains now the odd resultI get with FurMark in this post:ATI Catalyst 8.8 vs 8.7: OpenGL Performanc...
Okay, now let’s see the new features of FurMark 1.9.0. The graphics workload is heavier than in FurMark 1.8.2 to follow the GPU power processing of recent graphics cards. For example, a GTX 480 has a score of 6478 points (108FPS) in FurMark 1.8.2 in 1920×1080 while in FurMark ...
FurMark 1.18.0 Released (Updated: v1.18.2.0) 2016/08/26JeGX A maintenance release ofFurMark, the popularGPU burner, is available. One year after the release of version 1.17, it was time to update the bad boy of GPU tools. Continue reading» ...
FurMark 2.5.0 GPU Stress Test and Graphics Benchmark Continue reading» benchmark, Continue reading» Continue reading» benchmarkNVIDIAopenglpower consumption Continue reading» Continue reading» Continue reading» Continue reading» Continue reading»...
And now, the score when FurMark.exe is renamed in… ati.exe (why not?):4383points This score is almost twice the first one. Thatexplains now the odd resultI get with FurMark in this post:ATI Catalyst 8.8 vs 8.7: OpenGL Performance Drop. ...
–MSI Radeon HD 4850(Catalyst 9.5 – this version has no protection against FurMark) 1280×1024 – no effect: 1770 points 1920×1080 – no effect: 1600 points 1920×1080 – post FX: 1560 points 1920×1080 – displacement mapping: 1220 points ...