评分年份角色 政治秩序的起源7255 8.8 2014作者 政治秩序与政治衰败2068 8.7 2015作者 历史的终结与最后的人5383 8.3 2014作者 信任960 8.1 2016作者 美国处在十字路口110 8.0 2008作者 身份政治2526 7.7 2021作者 大断裂946 7.5 2015作者 落后之源108
New Books in History(2011) (Podcast Series)-Self - Political Scientist(1 episode, 2011) Francis Fukuyama, "The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution"(五月 3, 2011)Season 1, Episode 153-Self - Political Scientist (voice) ...
Macmillan Books: Author: Francis Fukuyaman/a
New Books in History(2011) (Podcast Series)-Self - Political Scientist(1 episode, 2011) Francis Fukuyama, "The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution"(五月 3, 2011)Season 1, Episode 153-Self - Political Scientist (voice) ...
Francis Fukuyama (1992), The End of Empire and the Last Man. (London: Penguin Books) Book Critic 来自 学术范 喜欢 0 阅读量: 70 作者: RW Macharia 摘要: Francis Fukuyama analyses whether the evolution of History, not in human or life form but of periodic political evolution has drawn to...
Francis Fukuyama on coronavirus and the crisis of trust How do democracies measure up against autocratic regimes in handling the pandemic? September 5 2018 FT Books EssayMichael Ignatieff Is identity politics ruining democracy? Michael Ignatieff on why we have to look beyond group identity and faile...
Francis Fukuyama (1992), The End of Empire and the Last Man. (London: Penguin Books) Book CriticCriticReviewFrancis FukuyamaHistoryLast ManFrancis Fukuyama analyses whether the evolution of History, not in human or life form but of periodic political evolution has drawn to an end. He examines ...
The Great Disruption: Francis Fukuyama, Profile Books Ltd. (1999), 354 pp., £20.00doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00066-2Barry HopewellElsevier LtdLong Range Planning
Francis FukuyamaBiotechnologyHuman NatureFor a short while after 1989, Francis Fukuyama was thought to be the leading academic Hegelian when he announced that, since the Soviet Union had collapsed, it was "liberal democracy" that was the end-of-history. Our Posthuman Future, published in 2002 by...
My review presents the argument that not only did Fukuyama not get it correct in 1989, but he also failed to go far enough in his own refutation. I introduce the case that intervention in biotechnology is a necessary step to make, not because there is a human nature to save but ...