The Ford Pinto was a famously bad automobile, but worse still might be Ford's handling of the safety concerns surrounding the '70s-era subcompact. Before the car ever reached the market, concerns emerged that a rear-end collision might cause the Pinto to blow up — the positioning of the...
英文概述One Bad Bump .The Ford Pinto was a famously bad automobile, but worse still might be Ford's handling of the safety concerns surrounding the '70s-era subcompact. Before the car ever reached the 7、market, concerns emerged that a rear-end collision might cause the Pinto to blow ...
The next two years followed the idea of the "worry free" car that Ford wanted to produce. The only changes in 1972 was the Runabout received a larger rear window and a new model was introduced, the two door wagon.In 1973 the Pinto exterior remained the same as the with exception of fr...
Many studies of reports and documents done by Mother Jones on rear-end collisions involving Pintos reveal that if you ran into that Pinto you were following at over 30 miles per hour, the rear end of the car would buckle like an accordion, right up to the back seat. The tube leading to...
The Pinto’s low pricing resulted in sales of 2 million units over the course of the decade. But, as we all know, the car also became notorious for its exploding gas tank. A design flaw allowed for the fuel tank to be punctured during rear-end collisions, resulting in dozens of deaths...
Ford has argued for over three decades that The Ford Motor Company is not at fault, but rather the other motorists who happened to rear end the Pinto drivers. Many accuse Ford of rushing the Pinto into production without proper testing leaving a faulty 1610 Words 7 Pages Good Essays Read Mo...
As Douglas Brinkley wrote in “Wheels for the World,” his history of Ford, the girls who died in the rear-end collision in Indiana on August 8, 1978, were apparently unaware of the Pinto-related dangers; their family would not receive a recall notice until early 1979. A grand jury late...
As a result, the Pinto was highly vulnerable to lethal fires in rear-end collisions and was in fact a "fire trap" and a "death trap." Ford decided to ignore the defect anyway, because re-design would have delayed the entry of the car into the market and caused a potential loss of ...
As detailed by MotorTrend, the Pinto’s fuel tank was located directly behind the rear axle, meaning that rear-end collisions, even at low speeds, would slam the axle into the gas tank. Axle bolts would puncture the tank and create a fuel spill that could ignite in several ways, in...
About 25 years ago, we covered a criminal prosecution in Elkhart, Indiana. It was a criminal prosecution of Ford for the deaths of two teenage girls whose Ford Pinto was rear ended and they were burned to death. It was a criminal homicide prosecution. It was the last time a homicide pros...