The Ford Pinto was a famously bad automobile, but worse still might be Ford's handling of the safety concerns surrounding the '70s-era subcompact. Before the car ever reached the market, concerns emerged that a rear-end collision might cause the Pinto to blow up — the positioning of the...
The Ford Pinto was a famously bad automobile, but worse still might be Ford's handling of the safety concerns surrounding the '70s-era subcompact. Before the car ever reached the market, concerns emerged that a rear-end collision might cause the Pinto to blow up — the positioning of the...
英文概述One Bad Bump .The Ford Pinto was a famously bad automobile, but worse still might be Ford's handling of the safety concerns surrounding the '70s-era subcompact. Before the car ever reached the 7、market, concerns emerged that a rear-end collision might cause the Pinto to blow ...
In his autobiography, Iacocca slips in a small discussion of the Fort Pinto. The Ford Pinto was infamous for having been a deadly vehicle in the case of a rear-end accident. If struck from behind, it would burst into flames within seconds. The problem was that the fuel tank was behind ...
The next two years followed the idea of the "worry free" car that Ford wanted to produce. The only changes in 1972 was the Runabout received a larger rear window and a new model was introduced, the two door wagon.In 1973 the Pinto exterior remained the same as the with exception of fr...
Ford has argued for over three decades that The Ford Motor Company is not at fault, but rather the other motorists who happened to rear end the Pinto drivers. Many accuse Ford of rushing the Pinto into production without proper testing leaving a faulty 1610 Words 7 Pages Good Essays Read Mo...
As detailed by MotorTrend, the Pinto’s fuel tank was located directly behind the rear axle, meaning that rear-end collisions, even at low speeds, would slam the axle into the gas tank. Axle bolts would puncture the tank and create a fuel spill that could ignite in several ways, in...
As a result, the Pinto was highly vulnerable to lethal fires in rear-end collisions and was in fact a "fire trap" and a "death trap." Ford decided to ignore the defect anyway, because re-design would have delayed the entry of the car into the market and caused a potential loss of ...
lights. Keeping costs at a minimum, only two headlights were used, mounted on the leading edge of the front fenders. A simple chrome-plated blade bumper capped off Pinto's face. Rear-end styling was simple, too: a flat panel with taillight assemblies straight out of the 1970 Maverick ...