First Amendment Supreme Court likely to uphold TikTok ban The Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a law that would ban TikTok as soon as this month. The justices appear to agree that the app's links to China are a national security threat. CBS News chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford ...
Recent federal court decisions reveal a growing tension between the US FDA's regulatory efforts and the courts' heightened vigilance in protecting the First Amendment, as well as preserving consumer access to truthful and accurate information through First Amendment commercial speech jurisprudence. This ...
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that a liberal advocacy group has a First Amendment right to call a Christian ministry a hate group for its opposition to homosexuality. U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson, in a 141-page decision issued late Thursday, threw out a complain...
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a pair of cases that could transform online speech. The two cases involve Republican-backed laws in Florida and Texas that restricted social media companies from moderating content. CBS News legal contribu
The Supreme Court kicked two cases challenging social media moderation laws in Florida and Texas back to lower courts
Client Alert: First Amendment Victory in U.S. Supreme Court: Unconstitutional to Require Charities to Disclose Donors’ Identities - See Quinn Emanuel's latest Publications
The Colorado Supreme Court has dealt another blow to the First Amendment, holding that public health concerns trump the First Amendment in cases involving bans on smoking. Curious Theatre v. Colorado Department of Health and Public Environment ...
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT--WASHINGTON COURT OF APPEALS UPHOLDS APOLOGY REQUIREMENT OF...Harvard Law ReviewHarvard Law ReviewHarvard Law Review
However, private actors can be held liable for violating the First Amendment when they are acting on behalf of the government or doing something that the government would normally do – a doctrine known as the “state action” doctrine. Today the Supreme Court ...
“Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of the meaning of words,” he wrote. Bingo.The bill,in weasel words remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that “anti-Semitism” is ...