I think having that level of customizability is good. An alternative API would be to have something like #4607 where the plan is an FFT callable object. peterbell10 commented on Jun 19, 2019 peterbell10 on Jun 19, 2019 MemberAuthor As far as compatibility with pyFFTW, I can't see ...
I came to this because I was getting results that do not seem correct performing a numpy fft on other data. My input data is below - it represents a 1kHz sign wave recorded at 44100 samples per second. When I perform an FFT on this using numpy I get a non-sensical, result that is...
Platforms: rocm This test was disabled because it is failing in CI. See recent examples and the most recent trunk workflow logs. Over the past 3 hours, it has been determined flaky in 5 workflow(s) with 5 failures and 5 successes. Debugg...