[ # 4 ]) IS DENIED. NO MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION, CLARIFICATION, OR MODIFICATION OF THIS DENIAL SHALL BE FILED OR ENTERTAINED. APPELLANTS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE OPENING BRIEF (DOCKET ENTRY NO. [ # 3 ]) IS GRANTED. THE OPENING BRIEF IS DUE DECEMBER 6, 2021. ...
On July 2, 2024, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, requesting a stay of the noncompete rule’s effective date. The FTC filed its opposition on July 25, 2024. The court allowed several financial services t...
On July 9, 2024, the Union filed a motion for reconsideration of IRS and a request for leave to file a supplemental submission concerning CFPB’s application to that case. .. CONTINUED .. FLRA DECISION: (.html) ♦ Nov 26 .. OCA: Seater v. KID .. Plaintiff was employed at Klamath...
The motions judge denied Vivint’s motion on the basis that Vivint forfeited the challenge by not having raised it during its first appeal. Vivint failed to ask for reconsideration of the motion judge’s decision within 14 days as required by Federal Circuit Rule 27(j). In now the ...
“Google”) in the Eastern District of Texas, asserting three related patents directed to data-processing systems. After the cases were transferred to the Northern District of California, that district court granted Google’s motion for judgment on the pleadings that the asserted claims were ...
2 The September 1,2010 date was established in a final rule;partial response to petitions for reconsideration published in the Federal Register (46 FR 12145)on March 9,2006 25485ederal Register/Vol. 72,No. 86/Friday(May 4) 2007/Rules and Regulations typically adjust vertically to accommodate...
As such, Uniloc’s motion “far from narrowly tailored as required by” the relevant local rule. Moving for reconsideration, Uniloc said it was willing to make public more than ninety percent of the material it had originally sought to seal. Uniloc also submitted declarations from several of ...
Under Biax, Straight Path argues, the district court abused its discretion by granting the motion for attorney fees. According to Straight Path, its view of infringement was “objectively reasonable” under the stipulated construction. Cisco responds that Straight Path took infringement positions...
waived for licensees in the 470-512 MHz segment of the UHF band (the T-Band). See Implementation of Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended, Order, WT Docket No. 99-87, 27 FCC Rcd 4213 (T-Band Order), on recon., Order on Reconsideration, 27 FCC Rcd...
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration of Order Setting Aside Earlier Order Issued by Delegated Authority and Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Th...