SYMPOSIUM: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN THE SPOTLIGHT: Entick v Carrington and Boyd v United States: Keeping the Fourth and Fifth Amendments on TrackRichard A. Epstein
Following the rules of war when in actual combat. There were rules about what we could and couldn’t do to prisoners, including their restraint. Would you or, in your estimation, a reasonable person continue to apply physical, bodily restraint when your subject is unmoving and non-responsive?
On May 25, 2022, the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China released the “Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Strengthening Blockchain Application in the Judicial Field” (hereinafter referred as...
We will work to see that the underlying institutions and rules of the market are unified, that market regulation is exercised in an impartial and unified manner, and that connectivity between market facilities is built to hi...
A jurisdictional theory of double jeopardy This Article offers a coherent way of thinking about double jeopardy rules among sovereigns. Its theory has strong explanatory power for current double jeopardy law and practice in both U.S. federal and international legal systems, recom... AJ Colangelo 被...